Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tats on teens


Hairless Cat

Recommended Posts

was sitting on the beach at Oak Island yesterday, and 3 teeny boppers parade past me in their kinis- couldnt help but notice all three had big tats over their ass - wtf is wrong with parentsl these days? I mean maybe a simple ankle tat wouldnt be too bad on a kid but a tramp stamp above her ass?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henna (temporary but realistic looking) perhaps?

Seems to be popular at the beach area. 16 and 17 year old year old girls that are finally out of the house for more than one night and they decide to go "buck wild".

I see local Wings stores offering it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its trashy as hell and I'm 24. I dont know why people think its so cool. Would you put a bumper sticker on a Porsche?

Well said. I don't have a problem with tats buut they can easily look trashy. Everyone I know that has lots of tats regrets them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said. I don't have a problem with tats buut they can easily look trashy. Everyone I know that has lots of tats regrets them.

Its funny because I have friends that havent grown up enough to realize this and they think I'm a pussy for not branding myself like a middleschool kid's binder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just glad they keep getting them. I have a little girl that will need money to go to college. Thanks for coming and getting tattooed. Tell all your friends too! Of course in NC it is against the law to tattoo anyone under the age of 18 period. We check everyone's ID so if your over 18 come see me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...