Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Johnson Questionable w/ Injury


Ruff

Recommended Posts

After watching Ziemba knock him around the other night I bet he is sore.

Im so fuggin stoked that you guys are seeing that that dude is gamer. Never thought we had enough depth behind the starters there.

:iagree:

But seriously... wtf are these guys doing in practice to get so busted up?

playing football?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Franchise DE can sit if he is sore in a meaningless game.

absolutely. can't understand the "pussy" comments. it's a meaningless game. i wouldn't be surprised if there isn't any soreness at all. you don't want the guy you just gave a $76mil contract to to risk himself in a preseason game.

it's just not wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

playing football?

Referring to Gettis... Torn ACLs in Camp are not something I would consider "common" to Football practices.

The normal training camp injures + the fact that the players missed the true OTAs and work-outs because of the lock-out, well, these injuries are bound to pop up.

This is probably more likely of an explanation. Strength and Conditioning is important. I'm sure some of these guys aren't in prime-time shape having had all that time off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the Panthers shouldn't risk it with CJ, but I think preseason is more important for teams coming off of a bad year. We need to get some wins so the Panthers can get their confidence back and start believing in the new system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...