Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Broncos' talk with Cutler goes sour


NCMTNCAT

Recommended Posts

Trade rumors back to the fore

Broncos coach Josh McDaniels was part of a conference call Monday with disgruntled quarterback Jay Cutler.

According to an NFL source, the call left the quarterback believing that if the Broncos find the right deal, he will be traded between now and the NFL draft that begins on April 25.

Cutler was in Nashville when the call was placed. He was accompanied on the call by his agent Bus Cook. Broncos owner Pat Bowlen and general manager Brian Xanders also were part of the call.

Cutler has been irked since learning McDaniels tried to trade him to Tampa Bay nearly two weeks ago in a proposed deal that would have brought New England quarterback Matt Cassel.

http://www.denverpost.com/sportsheadlines/ci_11882256?source=rss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, if he wants to get paid like a mercenary, then I suggest he develops the thicker skin required by one. I smell too much "Farvish" drama generated by Bus Cook.

"Believing", not what was actually said.

According to an NFL source, the call left the quarterback believing that if the Broncos find the right deal, he will be traded between now and the NFL draft that begins on April 25.

According to the source, Cutler entered the conference call believing any friction between the two parties would be resolved and the two sides would put the controversy behind them. Instead McDaniels told Cutler no one is untradeable and that the quarterback was expected to report for the team's offseason conditioning program that begins Monday.

English lesson for Cutler-> "no one is untradeable" =/= you will be traded.

Just my take, but I think this is just the new head coach's way establishing his authority. I kinda like it actually. It removes the common complaint about the new boss, "Well, we used to do it this way, and it was better." Don't get me wrong, he can still make that complaint, but he now knows it will do him no good. They guy now knows he will either get on board with the new coach's philosophy or be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, if he wants to get paid like a mercenary, then I suggest he develops the thicker skin required by one. I smell too much "Farvish" drama generated by Bus Cook.

I have also read that Cook engineered the PR nightmare of the whole McNair fiasco in Tenn. At least he hasn't done anything of that kind with Luc.

Sounds like from that piece that Cutler was expecting a hankie and a cookie and a pat on the head though. If he doesn't report for offseason stuff he's an even bigger whiner than I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only person who would rather have Delhomme than Cutler?

Cutler is still unproven! He has lost more games than he's won, and he's in a poor division. His health is an issue. Oh, and he's a whiner.

Jake may not be the most skilled player of all time (I still think he might be as good at Cutler), but at least he has definitely got "heart". I'm fine with looking for a solid replacement next year, when it's contract time. But for now, let's not trade away Peppers for an unproven, whiny, unhealthy QB...when we've already got one who works well with what we've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you're not. I'm one of them too. Everyone talks about Cutler's big arm. Give me a freaking break. The guy has zero heart, gives pathetic effort, and thinks he's the greatest. I don't want him anywhere near this team.

Don't get me wrong, after seeing Jake's play, I'm not against finding a new QB. But not Cutler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only person who would rather have Delhomme than Cutler?

Cutler is still unproven! He has lost more games than he's won, and he's in a poor division. His health is an issue. Oh, and he's a whiner.

Jake may not be the most skilled player of all time (I still think he might be as good at Cutler), but at least he has definitely got "heart". I'm fine with looking for a solid replacement next year, when it's contract time. But for now, let's not trade away Peppers for an unproven, whiny, unhealthy QB...when we've already got one who works well with what we've got.

I read the first sentence then looked at your sig and ignored the rest of your post....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...