Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PC game suggestion


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

League of Legends. Its free to play and similar to RTS style of play. If you have ever played the WCIII mod DOTA, it is very similar to that. (Makers of LoL made DOTA)

It is classified as a massie online battle arena (MOBA)

I have been hooked for a while now. If you want to give it a try let me know. I can send you a referral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RTS = Real time strategy, basically command and conquer, age of empires, and uh, some others I don't know anymore.

I noticed Steam had a sale on the "Cossacks & American Conquest" games, which are real time strategy games that offer historical campaigns and stuff in early american and european history, but I haven't tried them. They came out in the early-mid 2000s... if you look at http://store.steampowered.com/app/115210/?snr=1_6_4__421, you can find the "metacritic" review of the game and check out some of the reviews of it.

here's the link to the package: http://store.steampowered.com/sub/11264/

sometimes I buy from Steam, othertimes I use it to find games. Steam is kinda a pain, but whatever.

pretty sure they are single player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go get an old copy of BF2, which I'm sure your computer can run, and download project reality. Then meet me on the Tactical Gamer server. Not only will it take you a good 10-20 hours to get the hang of every role, but it's a great time waster. I don't play it too much anymore as I'm usually too busy, but I've logged a ridiculous amount of time playing it since I first downloaded it (version .51, the game usually has 1-2 big updates per year and they're currently they're on version .97) a few years ago. Very addicting once you get the hang of it. Currently there are two game modes: AAS, which is between two conventional forces, and insurgency, which is asymmetrical. Current factions include U.S., British, PLA, Russia, Canada, MEC, Germans, Chechens, Taliban, and Iraqi insurgents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCII's campaign was fun but short... Highly suggest you pick it up if you liked C&C/AoE type games, as it's also an RTS game but with nice graphics and a good story.

for that matter, if you never played the first strarcraft games, you might want to pick them up too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently picked up StarCraft II. I was a huge fan of StarCraft, but had been busy with nursing school when SC II came out. StarCraft II has a great single player campaign and of course Battle.net multiplayer is always good. I'm really enjoying it so far and recommend it. Especially if your a RTS fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...