Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

80's Stars then and now...


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

Great gallery on thechive today...

The ones who have had the most surgical work look (by far) the worst...

The Good...

Christie Brinkley

girls-80s-then-now-12.jpg?w=499&h=755girls-80s-then-now-13.jpg?w=500&h=744

Jennifer Beals

girls-80s-then-now-18.jpg?w=500&h=643girls-80s-then-now-19.jpg?w=500&h=682

The Bad...

girls-80s-then-now-10.jpg?w=500&h=626girls-80s-then-now-11.jpg?w=500&h=819

...and that's a good "now" pic of Heather... I've seen her lately and she looks horrible.

Daryl Hannah

girls-80s-then-now-20.jpg?w=500&h=477girls-80s-then-now-21.jpg?w=500&h=749

See them all here...

http://thechive.com/2011/10/05/girls-from-the-80s-then-and-now-40-photos/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please don't take this the wrong way but I'm unaware who many of these women are. Is Christine Brinkley the woman who played Murphy Brown?

Youngin's these days... :rolleyes:

Call me crazy but I would still nail Kim Basinger. She's held up nicely imo. And in the Now picture she is eye fuging the hell out of the camera.

Yes, and Brooke Shields too, they are showing their age but they are still attractive, hell even Jamie Lee Curtis looks nice, and I bet her tits are still great too...

I don't understand why these ladies like Heather Locklear go so crazy over this plastic surgery/botox/lip injections etc. They look horrible... it's so fake and obvious. Just grow old gracefully and naturally... it's much more classy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The game thread is stream of consciousness. I may or may not have made a tasteless remark I don’t recall.    I know that my reaction was mixed, , not sure if I thought it was a positive or a negative in terms of.the game.    What I do know is we don’t need him hurt in the middle of a year where the jury is looking to come in on his future. fug that we need him playing and healthy so it is a fair game evaluation wise.    That is absolutely the most important thing in my mind by a large margin. I am not happy he is hurt, at all. 
    • It's Wednesday, we're bored, and suffering theough another Halloween cooking show pretendingto be interested. What'd you expect. 
    • I wasn't saying that's the only way to get one. My post was in direct response to the "if you have the opportunity to get a game breaking TE, you take them" I was just saying that if you're taking a TE in the 2nd or 3rd round, you're just hoping they can become that game breaking TE.  The ones that you KNOW will become that, are the guys like Bowers or Warren who go in the early 1st round. We just took mid round TEs that both show solid potential, I don't see how taking a TE in the 1st would make sense over the other available players.  And taking one in even the 2nd or 3rd just seems like to big of a risk at that position when we have so many other needs.
×
×
  • Create New...