Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just found out about ANOTHER rule change...more QB safety


Ccat

Recommended Posts

Saw that when I was reading about the other rule changes. NFL = PFL Pansy Football League. Once a defender has been knocked to the ground he can't make a tackle on a QB unless he completely gets back up. No longer can a player go with force at the legs of a QB.

Mann, it must suck being a ref. Having to know all these rules and make these crucial calls in live game speed is extremely difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if a guy is say a foot from a Qbs legs he must not touch him until he gets back up?

From what I understand, I think they can still swipe their arm at his leg or grap him with his arms but he cant lunge his body below the QB's knees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's going to make it harder and harder for players to play...having to think about the minutia of these things. If they want to get rid of it, they should just say NO HITTING BELOW THE KNEES...not ok I have to think about if I am lunging, if I am going to hit him with the forearm, etc. Prime example that NYJ guy who about decapitated Boldin last year. That was simply the result of playing football at 100% speed. He can't sit there and dissect, WHILE THE PLAY IS HAPPENING..."well the other DB is coming at 'X' angle, so I'd better veer off or Boldin breaks his face when I hit him".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are a year or two away from making it where you cant touch the QB at all. Fans grow tired of the yellow flag flying all game but with rules like this it just makes it worse. Every team will eventually because a pass first team with rules like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...