Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Colts are a warning to the Panthers


Jangler

Recommended Posts

That was the point I was making about Detroit. Thats why I said "On the other hand". ;)

They have not had a dominant Defense, and their QB has gotten injured and they completely fell of the map.

The Vikings have had very solid Defenses over the years, and competed even when they had avg QB play. Thats why the addition of Favre made them contenders.

I agree with you. Great defense can help any offense and keep you in the game. New Orleans was a classic example of a team that has had consistently good offenses for the past several years, but their team succeeds or struggles more on how the defense is playing. Someone could say New England is the exception but the fact they haven't won a playoff game since 2007 is a function of their defense more than the offense. Teams can win in the regular season with a great defense or offense but in the playoffs it usually takes both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really?

Trent Dilfer

Brad Johnson

Jeff Hostetler

Jim Plunkett

forget making it TO the SB, these 4 jokers won the SB. your point is invalid in every way its possible to be invalid.

the door's <---- that way mr fox.

the game has changed quite a bit the past few years. it's much more of a passing league now with rule changes and such. the rules protect the passer more and keep the DB off the WR and make it easier to pass the ball. as a result, teams are passing a lot more and it has become so that you have to have a QB that can play at a top level to even stay competitive.

if you have an average QB, then you have to have a shut down defense. if you have a below average QB, there's no way you are going to go far. defense won't win you much of anything anymore. it will only help you outscore the other team. it's your QB and the passing game that is going to decide if you win or not.

btw...plunkett was a good QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ummm I'll take the ring then worry about the rest later.

Well I hope the Panthers worry about the rest, I'd rather see the Panthers be a powerhouse for years that a flash one year and then gone because we didn't build a strong team for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do get into a cap situation at some point, I think that's a big part of what has happened to the Colts, they had to skimp in other places so they could continue to afford Manning.

Having a QB like Manning play at a high level for as long as he has is both a blessing and a curse in the era of the salary cap. It's a blessing until he gets hurt and then all you have left is the watered-down roster you had to maintain in order to afford him.

I do fault them for not drafting a QB that they were grooming to take over the starting job for Manning, it's obvious they had very little confidence in Painter.

This is what I wonder about, is this present Panther FO (Hurney) smart enough to plan around Cams next contract? The Panthers have never had to pay a player this amount before. The last high dollar player negotiations didn't work out so well. Next year they have to start building contracts around Cams next one. I just hope they can do it, and know when to get rid of players, like NE and Pitt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jon Beason, Greg Olsen, Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy, J-Stew, D-Will, Steve Smith, should I keep going?

I think you should keep going...

This thread makes this guy look like a major band wagon fan. "Cam newton is that there Carolinas only good player" says the redneck retard. GO back to watching Nascar. No wonder there is sign in your front yard that says caution special kid lives here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the door's <---- that way mr fox.

the game has changed quite a bit the past few years. it's much more of a passing league now with rule changes and such. the rules protect the passer more and keep the DB off the WR and make it easier to pass the ball. as a result, teams are passing a lot more and it has become so that you have to have a QB that can play at a top level to even stay competitive.

if you have an average QB, then you have to have a shut down defense. if you have a below average QB, there's no way you are going to go far. defense won't win you much of anything anymore. it will only help you outscore the other team. it's your QB and the passing game that is going to decide if you win or not.

btw...plunkett was a good QB.

a lot of people automatically cite the 2000 ravens defense when justifying how important it is to have a "shut down defense" even more than having a QB and that it's more of a worthwhile investment.

...what they don't realize is that it's much harder to build a defense that only allows 165 points in a season than it is to find a reliable passing QB. Without even looking at how many points actually were scored against the ravens by fumble returns, interception returns, ST returns that's 31 less points than the 2010 Panthers offense scored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Dennis Dixon would be a good back up for Cam.

They have somewhat similar skill sets, and we wouldnt have to change the offense too much.

I think he is a FA next season too.

hm.

Agreed, they should look to bring in a backup with a similar skill set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, they should look to bring in a backup with a similar skill set.

Given that Chud built this offense to fit around Newton but when he was in

San Diego he helped build an offense around Phillip Rivers who doesn't have the same skill sets as Newton, I don't thiink a backup with similar skill sets is necessarily the only answer. After all, who in the league has even close to Newton's size, speed, arm strength, and elusiveness and wouldn't be an automatic starter. A backup is just that for a reason. I would rather have a solid vet with a good arm and understanding of the offense as a backup than try and get a Dennis Dixon or Tavaris Jackson type QB who may be athletic but struggles making all the throws.

Chud will adapt the offense to whoever is back there. He seems good like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that Chud built this offense to fit around Newton but when he was in

San Diego he helped build an offense around Phillip Rivers who doesn't have the same skill sets as Newton, I don't thiink a backup with similar skill sets is necessarily the only answer. After all, who in the league has even close to Newton's size, speed, arm strength, and elusiveness and wouldn't be an automatic starter. A backup is just that for a reason. I would rather have a solid vet with a good arm and understanding of the offense as a backup than try and get a Dennis Dixon or Tavaris Jackson type QB who may be athletic but struggles making all the throws.

Chud will adapt the offense to whoever is back there. He seems good like that.

agreed for the most part. i said somewhere else that the backup should be someone with a big arm who is mobile and hopefully who has experience in a coryell...preferably a chud or norv turner type coryell. they don't have to be able to run the way newton does, but they do need to be able to move in the pocket and buy time with their feet.

chud could make it work with someone who was like that, but i really believe he would struggle with clausen back there the way he did with quinn in cleveland. yeah...i know they aren't the same QB, but i don't think they really fit what chud was trying to do. it would take a whole lot less work for everyone on the offense if he was able to at least make the big throws downfield.

until we can find someone a bit more mobile, i think DA is a pretty good choice for a backup. much better than clausen, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • More so than the stats it was against that killer defense in their own stadium, the same defense that made Mahomes look like a total JAG in the SB. The way Bryce handled adversity all game was simply phenomenal , the off script play in the end zone, scrambling out of a sack/safety to find XL deep was one of the best plays we have seen out of a Panthers QB on what should have been a game winning drive
    • He’s about to be 0-12 in the conference finals and we’ve been outscored 16-4 in this series after only losing 2 games the previous two rounds and looking really in control of the series. There’s major red flags here as to why he seems so overmatched once he gets to a certain level. There comes a point where “just getting there” isn’t good enough. We are at that point. 
    • Listening to the post-game, and holy poo! Has Rod ever said, "this one's on me." When asked about composure, he threw Staal and Martinook under the bus. "Those 2 can't be your best players." Disregarding that he didnt answer the question, does he realize how that sounds to professional athletes? When asked how you prepare for game 4, "I'm not even thinking about that." Clearly, Rod.
×
×
  • Create New...