Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton Changing the way the quarterback position is played.


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if this has been posted. Didn't see I link. I believe this is the espn 32 video that's been missing.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/26703/nfl32-what-did-learn-about-young-qbs

A few of us were discussing the posibility of cam changing the way the game was played even before he was drafted. Many of the talking heads around the huddle said this wasn't possible. after seeing what we've seen so far what say you???

SN: I don't know how to embed the video so if someone who does can do that it would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh :nonod:

There's always some writer or analyst who throws out the whole tired "changing the game" line, and they're just about always referencing a black quarterback.

News Flash: I'm pretty sure the game has seen quarterbacks who can both run and pass before. And they haven't all been white either.

I'd add that for the "game to be changed" as the theory goes, you'd need about a dozen more quarterbacks on the horizon that have Newton's combination of size, running and passing ability. How many can you name that fit that description?

Newton is a great quarterback, but he's not "changing the game". He's playing the game at a very high level, same as guys like Brett Favre, John Elway, Steve McNair and others did before him.

That's enough for me. I don't need the "game to be changed". I just need the guy who plays quarterback for us to be good at the game as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont know about all that but i guarantee you the saints, falcons, and bucs are going to change their drafting strategies based on trying to stop cam newton. he has changed our division for years to come.

That I'll give you.

And that means way more to me than supposedly "changing the game".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Vick was supposed to change the way QBs played the game.

Cam takes dumps that are tougher than Vick.

What Vick was supposed to do was usher in an era of running quarterbacks.

He didn't, and neither will Newton, but for different reasons.

Vick didn't change the game because he wasn't a good enough passer to be considered a true dual threat. Newton won't change it because, like the others mentioned above, he's a passer first. The running ability is just an added weapon, same as it is for guys like Aaron Rodgers.

I'm not even sure why people compare Newton to Vick. They really don't have that much in common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has never been a QB with his COMBINED skill set speed and power, big arm and he has been accurate. Swag Newton is special.

Like he said in the interview pre draft with Primetime he's a little bit of Vick, a little bit of Big Ben/Brady etc. Which makes his potential off the charts along with his work ethic to want to be one of the great's at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilfer's not saying that teams will be looking for Newton-lites in the draft (although I'm sure some will take gambles in hopes they can find someone even remotely like him) but that Cam is demonstrating that supremely athletic quarterbacks actually can thrive as pocket passers if they have the drive and mental makeup that desires to do so.

And frankly, there have been athletic QBs even in recent years that showed those abilities, but it wasn't often that the most physically gifted player on the team was the quarterback.

He thinks Cam will help remove the stigma regarding the physicality of a player meaning that the player would not be mentally tough or astute enough to excel at the position. The game-changing aspect may be that future players see that Cam can be both a physical force and thrive in the traditional role of a quarterback, and desire to be quarterbacks rather than receivers or tight ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its a valid arguement that dilfer is making. He could change the way people view how quarterback is played. Simply by allowing the young kids a early age who are the biggest strongest athletes on a team to become the quarterback. If that happens i think you might see more cam type players enter the college ranks, there for leading to potentially more in the NFL.

I know alot of you don't see it as possible I think it's already happening. The early success and affect of cam newton on the NFL could be felt as early as next year. With all the talk of Luck,jones, and barkley i exspect a Cam like talent RG3(robbert griffin III) to also rise up draft boards. He doesn't have much experince but,newton is proving that might not be as big of a factor as it use to be.

Don't be suprised if Griffin slides ahead of one of the big three just because of Newton. Accept the "Newton effect".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has never been a QB with his COMBINED skill set speed and power, big arm and he has been accurate. Swag Newton is special.

Like he said in the interview pre draft with Primetime he's a little bit of Vick, a little bit of Big Ben/Brady etc. Which makes his potential off the charts along with his work ethic to want to be one of the great's at QB.

yes there has

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilfer's not saying that teams will be looking for Newton-lites in the draft (although I'm sure some will take gambles in hopes they can find someone even remotely like him) but that Cam is demonstrating that supremely athletic quarterbacks actually can thrive as pocket passers if they have the drive and mental makeup that desires to do so.

And frankly, there have been athletic QBs even in recent years that showed those abilities, but it wasn't often that the most physically gifted player on the team was the quarterback.

He thinks Cam will help remove the stigma regarding the physicality of a player meaning that the player would not be mentally tough or astute enough to excel at the position. The game-changing aspect may be that future players see that Cam can be both a physical force and thrive in the traditional role of a quarterback, and desire to be quarterbacks rather than receivers or tight ends.

Good points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...