Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock Draft Mania


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

if Coples is there you have to take him. plus with his size he can play some 3 tech in a 4-3 scheme. he has done it before.

This, he'll come out and be the starter most likely. Coples can play the run well. (Hardy hasn't had as good a season as some on here make it out to be, he's been pretty horrible in run defense)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jawnyblaze i think you were the one who introduced the silly phrase "omg that would be like the smallest DL evurrrrrrrrrrrr!" when it obviously isn't.

also the bigger a DT you want the harder it is to find one who is well conditioned. For instance having 2 DTs about 350 lbs a piece in the interior isn't a great way to generate pressure. At 285 playing as a DT last year Coples dealt with many double teams because he was hard to contain, now I'm not saying put him in as a nose in a 4-3 but if you line him up as a 3-tech on a lot of downs that would be a favorable match up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying draft the biggest DT possible, and I'm not saying having the biggest D-line possible is important, I'm saying being way undersized is a problem. I've actually been pretty anti-Ta'amu and he's the biggest DT projected in the upper rounds. I want two DTs that are 300-320 lbs and two DEs that are preferably 270-285 lbs, but that is more flexible than the DT spot. A 280 lbs DT isn't going to hold the point of attack very well. He might shoot gaps occasionally, but he's just going to get blocked down away from the play when it's runs. Coples would be good for our pass rush, no doubt. That's not our weakness though. We're weak against the run, and having 3 DEs and 1 DT as our line would be a detriment to our run defense. That's all I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coples is not as good as everyone makes him out to be IMO. In the film against Miami he draws some holds and stuffs some runs, but seems like he just can't get around that corner for the sack. Also the frat brand on his arm is disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying draft the biggest DT possible, and I'm not saying having the biggest D-line possible is important, I'm saying being way undersized is a problem. I've actually been pretty anti-Ta'amu and he's the biggest DT projected in the upper rounds. I want two DTs that are 300-320 lbs and two DEs that are preferably 270-285 lbs, but that is more flexible than the DT spot. A 280 lbs DT isn't going to hold the point of attack very well. He might shoot gaps occasionally, but he's just going to get blocked down away from the play when it's runs. Coples would be good for our pass rush, no doubt. That's not our weakness though. We're weak against the run, and having 3 DEs and 1 DT as our line would be a detriment to our run defense. That's all I'm saying.

Jay Ratliff is listed @ 287 and he plays a 0 tech NT in a 3-4.

Coples is not as good as everyone makes him out to be IMO. In the film against Miami he draws some holds and stuffs some runs, but seems like he just can't get around that corner for the sack. Also the frat brand on his arm is disgusting.

what does his brand have to do with him playing football? the guy can command a double and have some pass rushing skills/ push the pocket as a 3 tech. he is DL and can play any position on the line hence making him more valuable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay Ratliff is listed @ 287 and he plays a 0 tech NT in a 3-4.

Ok. That's in a 3-4. We don't play in a 3-4 so what works for the Cowboys ain't gonna work for us. Ratliff has two guys over 300 lbs around him, and Ratliff doesn't play against the run very well. He's a pretty decent pass rushing DT, but if you count Ware as a DE they still run with my formula, two guys that are 270-285 (actually Ware is 260, but OLB in a 3-4 is ok to be smaller), two guys that are 300-320.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JawnyBlaze,

What you must realize is that most of the people arguing for Coples here are all UNC fans that are willing to overlook other key positions that need upgrades (OLB, RT, CB, DT, 2WR) just to see 'their' guy here. If you can come to terms with this, then you'll save yourself a lot of arguing. Sincerely,

Nicbsbll2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok. That's in a 3-4. We don't play in a 3-4 so what works for the Cowboys ain't gonna work for us. Ratliff has two guys over 300 lbs around him, and Ratliff doesn't play against the run very well. He's a pretty decent pass rushing DT, but if you count Ware as a DE they still run with my formula, two guys that are 270-285 (actually Ware is 260, but OLB in a 3-4 is ok to be smaller), two guys that are 300-320.

if he is bad vs the run, than why is he a pro bowler year in and out? a NT in a 3-4 scheme has to anchor the line and command a double team. with your formula you still have your size with Hardy and CJ at the DE spot 260-270+. Coples whose frame can add bulk to be 300+ without losing a step and a NT that is 300+. and im no unc football fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...