Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Long Can Steve Smith and Deangelo Williams Play in the NFL?


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

Yes the signing bonus is part of the guaranteed money, so yes he's getting around 22.6 million of his 43 million this year. His cap hit for this season is around 7 million if I remember correctly.

five-year, $43 million contract. The deal contains $21 million guaranteed, including a $16 million signing bonus and $5 million of Williams' second-year base salary.

Sounds right because the 16 mill bonus is prorated over 5 years.

Probably it will go something like this:

Numerous sources are now reporting that Williams will return on a 5 year, $43 million deal with $21 million in guaranteed money. However, contracts can't be looked at for just face value. This could easily be a back-loaded deal with money at the end he'll likely never see,

http://www.derp/2011/7/28/2300835/thursday-afternoon-fa-open-thread

The truly ugly cap figure would be the year after he was released when the entire prorated bonus must be accounted for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smith has a solid 3 years until he's truly declined. Deagelo, since his running style is less physical, I want to say 5 years. Almost all RBs hardly last 10 years in today's league.

He will be 29 next year......a 34 yr old Williams will struggle to be depth on a NFL roster. A 31-34 yr olod Williams will most likely struggle to make a roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very curious as to what you guys think, since these guys are such an integral part of our offense.

Sorry if this has been addressed before, I've been having serious problems with the huddle thread search function lately.

feel free to say how long other people on the team will last.

And how long do RB's and WR's usually last in general?

Steve Smith is still elite, so i would say he can be at least a #2 until he is 35-36.

Williams is 28, but i think he has at least 4 more good seasons in him despite the fictional "30" wall people say RB's hit, its not an accurate measure, the real measure is when a back hits 1,600 total Carries, its the amount of wear and tear not age that is a factor with RB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call it blind hometown, but I just can't bring myself to say Smitty will slow down or his level of play will not be at a high level....those words don't belong in the same sentence.

Totally agree. Smitty will stop playing before he gets to that level. He may stay an extra year to help out the team/young WR but other than that, he will retire when he knows he can't perform at a high level. Its hard to say when that will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Smith is still elite, so i would say he can be at least a #2 until he is 35-36.

Williams is 28, but i think he has at least 4 more good seasons in him despite the fictional "30" wall people say RB's hit, its not an accurate measure, the real measure is when a back hits 1,600 total Carries, its the amount of wear and tear not age that is a factor with RB's.

Not sure I like a finite end to a RBs career. If it happens you are done. If it does not happen you retire. DWill is like Cam, they both have that uncanny ability to avoid the BIG hit. (And for a RB, that is no mean feat.) Sure, RBs get banged around, and miss games, but at this stage of his career, DWill is still very healthy. I can see him playing 4 more years in this offense.

As for Smitty. That horse is running til' somebody takes him out. He will continue to run wild until some young stud comes along and sends him out to pasture, or his competitive juices diminish. Neither of which I see happening in the near future. So rejoice in the knowledge that "Cam to Smitty" is going to be around for the forseeable future.

Ain't it a great time to be a Panther fan? The team is improving, the schedule is getting easier, and the wins will soon be piling up. Good Zod my giddy is dam near out of control.

My giddy says it is so, so I believe it. And GOOO CATS!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call it blind hometown, but I just can't bring myself to say Smitty will slow down or his level of play will not be at a high level....those words don't belong in the same sentence.

exactly... he's too beastly, too focused, too driven and too athletic to play poorly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well he quickly deflected the question about Rico's "almost 7 YPC." He is very polished and he transitioned well to non-answers and side steps. I can see why a guy like him was able to pull the wool over on guys like Tepper.
    • 31st rushing D and 8 carries by Rico is coaching.  Rico is easily the best offensive weapon right now and it’s not really close.  *literally everyone knows Dalton is washed, horrible and shouldn’t even be a backup QB.   Drive 1? ZERO carries.  Coaching.  Drive 2 - Rico was playing great.   Did Canales lean into that or go for “balance”? Coaching. Drive 3 - ZERO carries.  Coaching  Drive 4 - 1 carry and opted for Jimmy Horn gadget rush (you can’t stick  with the Horn repetitive gadget runs each week and that’s not a better idea than getting Rico going)  Drive 5 - basically Dalton heavy as the half expired.  I don’t need to watch a game to know it’s coaching.  The gameplan wasn’t about setting Rico up to go off on a trash rush D.  It was bullshit harmony balance of the rush and the pass and making Hubbard feel good.
    • In the locker room after the Dallas game, multiple  players said FEED him when Canales mentioned Rico stats. That already made me think even the locker room wouldn't care if Rico got the touches rn. This is on Canales indeed and I agree n the Qb take.  We aren't winning  bc of Bryce  but he has been managing it. Had the Jets had Qb aptitude,  we could've probably  lost that game too. All they would've needed is 14 points. Regardless, we got a team  that's being built up and that position needs an overhaul.  If ww lock in to Bryce, it'd be no different  than the 49ers locking into Purdy. Can't do it!
×
×
  • Create New...