Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons to Not Like Cam at This Point


Delhommey

Recommended Posts

Team Dalton might want to talk "stats" once the Bengals run up against the meat of their division schedule.

Or at least stop attributing wins/losses to quarterbacks.

Has their defense lost 4-5 starters for the season? No, their defense is lights out and they are winning games how we are losing them. Andy Dalton is nowhere near Cam Newton regardless of Record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know hes kept us in games and we've lost games with turnovers as well. But at least, those turnovers didnt cause 40 point blowouts. We do just enough to kill ourselves, and yes Cam is a part of that. But we also keep ourselves in games and that is because of Cam.

:beatdeadhorse5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team Dalton might want to talk "stats" once the Bengals run up against the meat of their division schedule.

Or at least stop attributing wins/losses to quarterbacks.

We'll see. They were expected to finish dead last and be in the hunt for Andrew Luck so it seems Dalton is doing something right. Oh by the way he just won rookie of the month over Cam so i guess i'm not the only one seeing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has their defense lost 4-5 starters for the season? No, their defense is lights out and they are winning games how we are losing them. Andy Dalton is nowhere near Cam Newton regardless of Record.

Yeah so that's why Dalton fans have to talk about his "win-loss record". It's literally the only thing Dalton('s team) has done better than Cam. I think Dalton's comp. % is like one or two percentage points better than Cam's but that's it.

Attributing wins/losses to quarterbacks in general is a tacit admission that you ride the short bus.

Oh by the way he just won rookie of the month over Cam so i guess i'm not the only one seeing this.

Oh so you do care about meaningless awards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Absolutely. Despite the turnovers and the terrible slips we only gave up 17. If the offense could have mustered a single productive drive after the start of the game ...
    • I think Tepper (and owners in general) have  more influence on team personnel than most of us realize. Remember how Brenton "Sunshine" Berson was a roster lock when JR owned the team?  Frank Reich didn't want to draft Bryce, Tepper did. I remember him saying in an off-season meeting that the team wouldn't have to break the bank on WR's because of BY's processing ability and his ability to distribute the a ball to like a point guard to the skill position guys. Frank quickly realized it was almost hopeless situation. And, why are we running a 3-4 defense? We ran a 4-3 for almost two decades. One year after Tepper takes over, we went to a 3-4 and continue to do so despite never drafting the appropriate personnel to run it after Rivera was fired. Owners have a lot of say on what happens on that field. Look how Al Davis tried to ruin Marcus Allen's career essentially benching him during his prime years. Canales got this job because Tepper wanted someone who could "fix" Bryce; and Canales was overly eager to get his first coaching job and felt up to the task. No top coaching prospect was going to want to come to Carolina with our track record since Tepper bought the team and having their destiny tied to Bryce as his QB. A top GM candidate from outside the organization would feel the same way. In theory, it was too early to cut bait with him after only one season Dan and Dave knew one another and both wanted to be "the guy" in charge as coach and GM. Carolina provided the ideal opportunity. On the surface this hire, if successful, could validate Tepper's decision to give a fool's ransom for Bryce and he could fill the GM spot with a body but still have someone in power that he was familiar with. In all honesty, it we had a good QB and a capable back-up on the roster I doubt we'd be having this conversation because we'd probably be one of the top teams in the NFC.
    • Just reeks of bullshit. Good college QB but when you were watching him as an NFL prospect the physical limitations and playing style concerns were very obvious. Teams across the league almost certainly evaluated him as a backup QB prospect and the last thing you want out of a backup QB is a distraction. Strip away the media hype job, add in all the reports that Shedeur essentially completely blew off the pre-draft process and turned teams off essentially cementing what many already thought and nothing about his draft plummet was surprising. Watch the Browns draft room as the pick was announced. It's very obvious that wasn't their pick. The owner stepped on and said get me that press attention. Why would that have happened if there was a directive from the league not to draft him? It just doesn't pass the bullshit litmus test. 
×
×
  • Create New...