Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dispelling the new myth about our offense and defense

teeray

By teeray,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Stew23 Newbie

Stew23

Posted
Posted

I am now convinced Teeray is the biggest idiot on the Huddle when it comes to numbers.

Your list ranks offenses by EXPECTED POINTS ADDED. NOT EFFICIENCY. MORON!

EFFICIENCY IS YPP. YARDS PER POINT. Your list doesn't even have it.

But this one does: http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/yards-per-point

We were 22nd before yesterday. We are now 21st. We have IMPROVED when we didn't play at all! That's how bad our efficiency is.

This means our offense is incapable of beating a defense ranked better than 21st. That means our offense could not beat our OWN fuging defense you idiots! Offense efficiency is the #1 reason a PPG rankings for the defense goes up or down. Nothing affects a PPG ranking more for the defense than offense inefficiency. Whether its yours, or your opponents(aka schedule full of efficient offenses).Which is why our defense is ranked 28 in points allowed or 29th whatever they are today.

But you are right about the first part. It's what I have been saying all year long. Our offense SHOULD be in in the top 10 in PPG. They are EXPECTED too even by YOUR OWN stats. But they are one of the most INEFFICIENT offenses in the NFL and we DON'T.

Making the Defense's PPG 29th. It will not improve without the offense ranking better in offense efficiency. It's is nearly impossible.

You got yours hands on an even more "complex" chart you have no idea how to use. LMFAO.

So you proved you CANNOT disprove that. It is not a myth. And if anyone else actually cares to discuss real football since I keep getting banned here for trying to rate our team correctly, you can come here: http://pantherstalk.com/forum/index.php?topic=14.0

And yes, stats mean nothing to you! That much is clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

And I think idiots posters like Teeray has given this entire place herpes. And anybody else who keeps saying defense is worse than our offense. Just a bunch of dumbasses that don't understand football or how the game works.

what on earth separates you from said "dumb-asses?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stew23 Newbie

Stew23

Posted
Posted

Here's what OTHER people are saying about efficiency NOT JUST PFFL. But people WHO DO understand FOOTBALL. From STAT INTELLIGENCE:

To me, the strengths of Yards-Per-Point are as follows

*Clear and indisputable connection to the reality of what happens on the field.

*Clear delineations between quality and a lack of quality.

*An ability to reflect on offense and defense at the same time.

*Not much vulnerability to relatively random points that are scored by special teams or the defense.

*An inherent consistency over time that lines up with the reality as we know it. Scores can be very misleading. A team may score a bunch of points because of lucky breaks. It’s yard to “luck” your way into good or bad YPP numbers.

http://statintelligence.blogspot.com/2007/11/making-football-predictions-with-yards.html

And yet this whole fuging place has it backwards and go around posting it all day long. Who has the idiot herpes?

I got out and still trying to eliminate the symptoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rubi Experienced

Rubi

Posted
Posted

Here's what OTHER people are saying about efficiency NOT JUST PFFL. But people WHO DO understand FOOTBALL. From STAT INTELLIGENCE:

And yet this whole fuging place has it backwards and go around posting it all day long. Who has the idiot herpes?

I got out and still trying to eliminate the symptoms.

I prefer the optimism over your negativity. Be gone troller. muahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • Jon Snow
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • bandu
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By bandu · Posted

      think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...