Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can't believe no one is talking about


Camdemonium

Recommended Posts

Hester was a corner who they moved to WR. Peterson is a rookie learning to play at the NFL level while leading his team to 2 victories on his own.

Give him time.

:lol: Hester comparison

He played all 3 sides in college. They drafted him as a corner and moved him to WR. Their intention was for him to contribute to special teams immediately.

I'm sure PP is going to be good. But at some point you don't have your #1 CB returning punts...well maybe you do if you are the Cardinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope no one is implying that two PR's for TD's were worth the 1st pick in the draft... :D

#HuddleInsecurity

...

What does this mean?

I don't know why people keep thinking that posts in the NFL forum about other players somehow always relate back to Cam.

Peterson has simply made plays this year that directly led his team to two victories and that last play was amazing and I was shocked there wasn't a thread on it.

No reason for people to be insecure anymore. Cam is our QB and looks more promising than any other rookie, but you gotta give credit where credit is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He played all 3 sides in college. They drafted him as a corner and moved him to WR. Their intention was for him to contribute to special teams immediately.

Charles Woodson did all 3 in college too, doesn't mean he wasn't primarily a corner.

If you have more interceptions than offensive TDs, you are a defensive player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...