Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football Outsiders updated Panthers statistics


teeray

Recommended Posts

DVOA by football outsiders:

Offensive efficiency: 8th (down from 6th)

Defensive Efficiency: 31st (unchanged)

Special teams: 32 (we aren't even close to 31st :nonod:)

Despite being 8th in offensive efficiency we took pretty big hits in key areas for offense. Among those:

Yards per drive: 8th (down but I can't remember by how much)

Points per drive: 14th (down from 6th)

TDs per drive: 12th (also down from 6th)

Punt per drive: 12th (I can't remember exact ranking from last week but it was single digits)

Offensive three and outs: 8th (surprised we didn't fall further there)

So things aren't going in the right direction for our offense :( And even though our defense seemed to play better last week we still are ranked at or near the bottom in most key areas so there wasn't much movement to my surprise:

Yards allowed per drive: 30th (36.48)

Points allowed per drive: 32nd

TDs allowed per drive: 30th

Defensive forced punts per drive: 28th

Turnovers per drive: 26th

Three and outs: 29th

I'm not that surprised that our overall defensive ranking didn't improve much but I did thinks some of the "per drive (possession)" would have improved more. :confused:

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamoff

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamst

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/drivestats

And of course for PFFL :thumbsup::

Offensive Yards Per Point: 25th (21st last week)

Defensive Yards Per Point: 29th (29th last week)

Turnover margin: 23rd

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/yards-per-point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason why anyone would assume ur defense was better on Sunday was because the offense didn't do well. By all accounts ur defense haven't improve one bit

In stats because it seems TPTB have placed all the burden on a rookie and the only area of the team that is playing decent.

Sadly, but if the mentality of this team does change they will be finishing their season at

2-14. Offense alone cannot win games no matter how much u try and fix all of ur QB's flaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It cuts both ways. Offensive efficiency is effected by lack of defensive turnovers, failure to stop the other team resulting in poor field position and a failure of the special teams to return punts or gain good field position on kickoffs. Our offensive efficiency is hurt tremendously by our defense giving up numerous long drives and allowing the other offense to convert 3rd downs and fourth downs. Our starting field position is among the worse in the league. The fact we have more 80 yard scoring drives than anyone else is a testament to the fact we start a lot at our own 20 or worse.

YPP is not simply how our offensive turnovers effect the other teams offensive's performance except to a small degree. On a pick six or in our end of the field absolutely it has a direct bearing, but so does defensive penalties, lack of ability to stop the other team and poor third down stopping capacity. If our defense does stop the other team's offense then we surrendered no points. On the other hand, if we turn over the ball on downs like we did against Green Bay inside the 10 and Green Bay goes over 90 yards to score on us, that is on the defense not the offense.

Offenses who have to go more than 40 yards to score are going to be less efficient because in the NFL most teams struggle to put together long drives unless they play us. As the stat guy, give us the number of offensive drives our defense has given up of over 40 yards. Our offense would score 30 plus a game if they played our defense every week.

If you want people to pay attention, be credible and believable. That means you have to give a less biased view of things and provide some balance. Totally one way arguments are seen as much less credible than those that present both sides but skew them to their point of view (debating 101).

I forgot the disclaimer. This is directed at the general audience not the troll of the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to rehash all of this again. Scoring efficiency (YPP) =/= the same as offensive efficiency.

If you are worried about field position for context our offense is among the worst in starting field position at 23rd.

Our defense's starting field position has been just slightly below average (18th). Yet still fails in every major category.

And field position has no bearing on Yards per drive (it actually would help it if we were really giving up that many short fields). Turnovers per drive. Or Three and outs.

The Scoreability Index is not purely an offensive yardstick. It is, instead, a great barometer of team success. It is a function of many team-wide factors, including general offensive strength, defense and special teams proficiency, turnover differential and Red Zone offense.

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Quality_Standings.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DVOA by football outsiders:

Offensive efficiency: 8th (down from 6th)

Defensive Efficiency: 31st (unchanged)

Special teams: 32 (we aren't even close to 31st :nonod:)

Despite being 8th in offensive efficiency we took pretty big hits in key areas for offense. Among those:

Yards per drive: 8th (down but I can't remember by how much)

Points per drive: 14th (down from 6th)

TDs per drive: 12th (also down from 6th)

Punt per drive: 12th (I can't remember exact ranking from last week but it was single digits)

Offensive three and outs: 8th (surprised we didn't fall further there)

So things aren't going in the right direction for our offense :( And even though our defense seemed to play better last week we still are ranked at or near the bottom in most key areas so there wasn't much movement to my surprise:

Yards allowed per drive: 30th (36.48)

Points allowed per drive: 32nd

TDs allowed per drive: 30th

Defensive forced punts per drive: 28th

Turnovers per drive: 26th

Three and outs: 29th

I'm not that surprised that our overall defensive ranking didn't improve much but I did thinks some of the "per drive (possession)" would have improved more. :confused:

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamoff

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamst

http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/drivestats

And of course for PFFL :thumbsup::

Offensive Yards Per Point: 25th (21st last week)

Defensive Yards Per Point: 29th (29th last week)

Turnover margin: 23rd

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/yards-per-point

If everyone quotes the OP, then it'll def be the never ending thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to rehash all of this again. Scoring efficiency (YPP) =/= the same as offensive efficiency.

If you are worried about field position for context our offense is among the worst in starting field position at 23rd.

Our defense's starting field position has been just slightly below average (18th). Yet still fails in every major category.

And field position has no bearing on Yards per drive (it actually would help it if we were really giving up that many short fields). Turnovers per drive. Or Three and outs.

Yes it is, and you have been wrong for the past 2 weeks. Yards divided by points. That is a total scoring offensive efficiency ratio. By definition. That's our real life scoring efficiency.

scoring efficiency is how many points we really, actually got in real life footbal from our total yards.

What you are posting is yardage efficiency + expected points(fantasy football works using similar DVOA stats).

And total offenses are ranked by points, not yards! That's what you need to win football games. POINTS! Top 10 offenses are ranked by the number of total points they put up compared to their opponent, not yards.

DVOA = what we are expected to do if we faced a perfect schedule and had an even turnover margin.

YPP = what we actually ended up doing.

DVOA rankings = FANTASY

YPP = REALITY.

You are looking at worthless stats instead of the ones that actually matter. The reason our offense is ranked 25th in YPP is because our offense never meets their DVOA expectations.

8th in DVOA /= to real life ranking.

25th in YPP = real life ranking. 2-7 real life winning-losing record.

Las Vegas. Sports Bookies. Sports Bettors. Power Rankings. They all use YPP. Scoring efficiency(at a more advanced level. because without taking into consideration strength of schedule, those are worthless as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...