Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marty Hurney likes Panthers' direction (article)


TruCatzFan

Recommended Posts

Title is self explanitory...

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7247289/carolina-panthers-heading-right-direction-according-gm-marty-hurney

"We have a plan," Hurney said. "Until you get there and start winning games, you always feel like there's a lot of work to do. And certainly there is."

"I think offensively we have shown the ability to change the momentum in games," he said. "Now we have to improve that in the other areas and start making the plays we need to make to win games."

...and now watch the Huddle flood gates open up! LOL

I just read it and figured it was something "news worthy"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nothing really new/interesting about that.

we all know hurney prefers to stick with drafted players. i did think we were a bit more aggressive this year though. its seems that the staff has a lot more clout than previous years with getting shockey before the lockout and immediately taking the bait when the email about olsen being available was sent out.

i hope we go for more experienced players for depth though. i'd rather have gaither, hartsock, hangartner, etc over 7th round practice squad rookie castoffs like kearse, hines, phillips, etc. though i guess they'd cost more...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Hurney isn't going to ignore that offensive side of the ball next offseason, he realizes the focus needs to be on defense and building depth after a year in which injuries hit the Panthers hard.
absolutely. pretty much a no brainer. aside from getting gettis healthy and getting RT taken care of, there really isn't a whole lot that needs to be done personnel-wise to the offense. it's just a matter of getting the playbook 100% down and everyone familiar with their roles.
Just nine games into the season, the Panthers already have 12 players on injured reserve, including six starters -- three on each side of the ball.
this is the biggest enemy to the season we have had.

If things remain the same the Panthers should have a pretty high draft pick in 2012, one year after taking Cam Newton with the No. 1 selection.

The Panthers should also have enough salary cap space to add some quality starters in free agency next year, although that's not something Hurney has typically done much of in the recent years.

.

.

.

"We felt like we needed to get a core and nucleus intact for several years and we feel like we have done that," Hurney said.

As for how aggressive the team will be in free agency next year, Hurney said he'll leave every avenue open for improvement. But he emphasized the Panthers plan to stick to their plan of developing their own draft picks rather than breaking the bank on signing free agents.

i do think we should spend more on FA and hopefully we can find a decent bargain or two, esp at DT and hopefully a return specialist.

i do think they have the nucleus they need on offense and defense, though.

STs needs a massive overhaul.

overall, though, i agree with hurney. the team is headed in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not as big of a Hurney-hater as some on here are, but I also don't understand how you can have potential back-to-back top 2 pick in the draft-type seasons and think your formula has been successful. I know about injuries and all, and I'm not asking for sparkly shiny FA's, but you gotta change the game up a little bit there Marty, cuz 2008 was a LLLLOOOONNNNGGGG time ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not as big of a Hurney-hater as some on here are, but I also don't understand how you can have potential back-to-back top 2 pick in the draft-type seasons and think your formula has been successful. I know about injuries and all, and I'm not asking for sparkly shiny FA's, but you gotta change the game up a little bit there Marty, cuz 2008 was a LLLLOOOONNNNGGGG time ago.

This somewhat may be the plan. We obviously still have some wholes, but look at the Lions right now, being in the crapper several years in a row brought them Megatron, stafford and Suh. Not too bad.

I'm sure that no one is tanking intentionally but it may be similar to last year, they held on making some short term moves and are rolling the dice with what we have. Up until last week's debacle I was really that upset with the team, yes it was frustrating but you saw signs of something better.

Last week, was a whole different level of fail, hope to see a bounce back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not as big of a Hurney-hater as some on here are, but I also don't understand how you can have potential back-to-back top 2 pick in the draft-type seasons and think your formula has been successful. I know about injuries and all, and I'm not asking for sparkly shiny FA's, but you gotta change the game up a little bit there Marty, cuz 2008 was a LLLLOOOONNNNGGGG time ago.
considering that they had to tear the team down so that they could rebuild it after fox took it down the wrong road so far...it shouldn't come as a total surprise.

the team wasn't built for the future with fox. it was built to try and re-create the '03 magic using the same people if possible, playing the same game the same way.

just chalk it up as a blessing that we'll have that many early picks on our team. it would have been great if we hadn't given up that 2nd last year for edwards, but water under the bridge....crap. that didn't make me feel any better.

anyway...i hope he's more open to bringing in more vet talent in key areas like he did this year via trade or free agency with shockey, olsen, and edwards (even if he wound up on IR, it was still a solid move). i just hope we can have a couple contracts restructured to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This somewhat may be the plan. We obviously still have some wholes, but look at the Lions right now, being in the crapper several years in a row brought them Megatron, stafford and Suh. Not too bad.

I'm sure that no one is tanking intentionally but it may be similar to last year, they held on making some short term moves and are rolling the dice with what we have. Up until last week's debacle I was really that upset with the team, yes it was frustrating but you saw signs of something better.

Last week, was a whole different level of fail, hope to see a bounce back

Well at this point I would love to have the #1 with Indy having the #2. That way we can trade them 1's plus a king's ransom, still pick up Kalil, and proceed to build a perennial contender.

And of course I'd rather win out and be 9-7, but realistically if we are gonna lose I'd rather lose 'em all and rape someone on a Herschel Walker-esque trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not as big of a Hurney-hater as some on here are, but I also don't understand how you can have potential back-to-back top 2 pick in the draft-type seasons and think your formula has been successful. I know about injuries and all, and I'm not asking for sparkly shiny FA's, but you gotta change the game up a little bit there Marty, cuz 2008 was a LLLLOOOONNNNGGGG time ago.

pretty much this.

I am probably one of the only Hurney supporters on this board. However, even my patience is beginning to wear thin. I don't know what it is, but something just feels "wrong" with this team. I don't know whose fault it is. I don't know if it's even time to start assigning blame. But I know I expect a more competitive team than we saw Sunday. If that becomes a trend, someone needs to get the axe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considering that they had to tear the team down so that they could rebuild it after fox took it down the wrong road so far...it shouldn't come as a total surprise.

the team wasn't built for the future with fox. it was built to try and re-create the '03 magic using the same people if possible, playing the same game the same way.

just chalk it up as a blessing that we'll have that many early picks on our team. it would have been great if we hadn't given up that 2nd last year for edwards, but water under the bridge....crap. that didn't make me feel any better.

anyway...i hope he's more open to bringing in more vet talent in key areas like he did this year via trade or free agency with shockey, olsen, and edwards (even if he wound up on IR, it was still a solid move). i just hope we can have a couple contracts restructured to make it happen.

Well Yas seems pretty convinced (according to article posted by someone else here already in another thread about Hurney) that we will have some cap room to sign talented free agents. I don't know how this is because I think there were threads here before about how we have zero wiggle room in the cap department. Hurney has been pretty spot on with first round picks, so to get Kalil and then hit on the #34 pick would be very beneficial for our future. On that note, fug you Otah. Oh what might have been...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...