Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Byron Bell


ItsPantone278

Recommended Posts

Question: Did you use your own eyes to evaluate Bell?

Comment: I think people should rely on their own eyes to evaluate this guy.

Concern: People will continue to go off of (+/-) stats that, especially in a single game, are virtually meaningless (even in a hockey/basketball game for which they are most effective), instead of just watching the kid play.

When Mathis got his sack, what was everyone on this board saying in the game thread..? "Cam got to get the ball out faster there." He gave up as many sacks and one more hurry than his LT counter part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ya I'm sorry.

Byron Bell is the future!!!

Proud of you Saltman. Just remember in the future to not buy too much into these stats sites. They view things too black/white rather than evaluating situations as a whole. They are nice for finding career stats for players and such, but typically don't do well when trying to view players as cogs rather than their own machine. Remember that, and you'll be just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: Did you use your own eyes to evaluate Bell?

Comment: I think people should rely on their own eyes to evaluate this guy.

Concern: People will continue to go off of (+/-) stats that, especially in a single game, are virtually meaningless (even in a hockey/basketball game for which they are most effective), instead of just watching the kid play.

When Mathis got his sack, what was everyone on this board saying in the game thread..? "Cam got to get the ball out faster there." He gave up as many sacks and one more hurry than his LT counter part.

Pretty sure that sack was off a stunt that brought Mathis into the middle. Know for a fact Mathis got a sack on that play, what I don't know if Mathis had more than one sack (meaning I don't know for sure if that is the sack the site is referring to) Either way, Mathis wasn't Bell's responsibilty once Mathus went to the interior. Not that a stat site could tell you that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: Did you use your own eyes to evaluate Bell?

Comment: I think people should rely on their own eyes to evaluate this guy.

Concern: People will continue to go off of (+/-) stats that, especially in a single game, are virtually meaningless (even in a hockey/basketball game for which they are most effective), instead of just watching the kid play.

When Mathis got his sack, what was everyone on this board saying in the game thread..? "Cam got to get the ball out faster there." He gave up as many sacks and one more hurry than his LT counter part.

I'm just stirring the pot

1659063-trollface_super.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...