Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam's argument for ROTY


smitty_89

Recommended Posts

Your team's performance holds no sway on a personal achievement award. Dalton's stats end up being alot better because of the high level of play of his Defense. Give him a shitty defense and he shits the bed trying to play catch up. Troll elsewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dalton had these weapons around him playing in the scheme we're in, being down by so many points due to our poor defense, he'd have thrown for 4500 yards by now and twice as many TDs.

I'm honestly disappoited in this post. You are usually so good at disguising your trolling, but really made yourself known on this one. Should have gone a tad more conservative. This post suggests Dalton would have finished the year with almost 6,000 passing yards, and that is obviously an implausible amount for even the dumbest of fans. Disappointing TRD, you're regressing. Not to mention, you literally JUST made a post stating wouldn't it be nice if we lived in a hypothetical world, to only then turn around and make a hypothetical statement. Poor form.

Oh. And Dalton would never survive in an offense that asked him to throw down the field consistently. Just to add something worthwhile to this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't think that me pointing out we don't live in a hypothetical world then making a dumb hypothetical post, like everyone here does with Cam and Dalton because all Dalton does is win, is in any way making fun of you guys?

The point, since you are a little slow, is you can say anything you want in a hypothetical and it holds no weight because it can't be proved.

"If Paul Pierce was on the Lakers, he'd have 7 rings."

That is one of my buddy's favorites. The Huddle favorite is "If Cam was in Dalton's situation, they'd be undefeated and Dalton would be looking for a new job."

All we know is Dalton wins and Cam puts up flashy numbers.

Dalton's offense is more conservative, Cam's is wide open and flashy.

Dalton's team is in the playoff hunt, Cam is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All we "know" about these players is what they've shown us in their brief career. What they've shown us, certainly suggests that if Cam were playing on the Bengals he would have a better record. It's not so much a hypothetical as it is an observation. If you don't think Cam having a more complete team would be advantageous to him, I suggest you reevaluate your percieved knowledge of the game. He may not have the stats he does now, because he wouldn't be asked to do as much-but he certainly would have the wins.

You seem to be under the impression Dalton is doing something Cam cannot, in spite of all evidence to the contrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dalton had these weapons around him playing in the scheme we're in, being down by so many points due to our poor defense, he'd have thrown for 4500 yards by now and twice as many TDs.

Good god, why you choose to remain here and why the mods choose to let you do so is well beyond any rational comprehension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't think that me pointing out we don't live in a hypothetical world then making a dumb hypothetical post, like everyone here does with Cam and Dalton because all Dalton does is win, is in any way making fun of you guys?

Ahhhhhh... now I get it.

How you doin', Jonah?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about this......if you truly want to argue that a teams performance bears weight on selecting OROY, the Derek Sherrod or Randall Cobb should be the only two talked about. After all, went from being almost out of playoff picture to undefeated over the course of a year and couple rookies.???????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...