Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Armanti redux


Hairless Cat

Recommended Posts

Well...I changed mine. I thought he would see the field some at WR this year but evidently he has not shown enough in practice to even do that. I am a 85 App grad and really was rooting for him to do well. He has not shown much returning either. Time for him to go and open a roster spot. Sad but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Highly unlikely Armanti gets cut before next year unless he blows in camp. Next year is the year he is supposed to start contributing... Hurney even said this offseason he wasn't expecting much out of him this year either, but to grow and improve.

smh if it's true that he said that. you give up a second rounder for a project that you're not expecting much out of in year 2 wtf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's far better than Legadu, Ajirotutu, and Pilares all around. Our offense doesn't use him the right way. It takes a good OC with swagger to make use of a player like Armanti. Steelers with Randel El for example. Though we finally showed a few signs of creativity yesterday with Legadu throwing the pass and Armanti lining up in backfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...