Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quinton Coples


Lout

Recommended Posts

Let me be the first to say, I do not think DE is a top need of ours.. however, I think Coples would be a drastic upgrade over Hardy in terms of run stopping and I don't feel we would lose anything in pass rushing.

The only reason why I think Coples is a possibility is because I think the beginning of the draft will look like this:

1. Colts - Luck

2. Rams - Blackmon

3. Vikings - Rieff

4. Browns - Robert Griffin III

5. Jags - Claiborne

6. Redskins - Barkley

7. Eagles - Jeffrey

8. Bucs - Kirkpatrick

9. Cheifs - Landry Jones

So who would be on the board on defense that would fit a need.

Zach Brown, Devon Still, and Quinton Coples. We take one of these guys or trade down.

The more I read about Coples, the better I like him.. the guy's best position is LDE because he sets the edge and is so powerful that he just bull rushes the RT right back into the QB.. he also has a great rip move and decent swim move. Here is a scouting report:

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1630323/quinton-coples

Right now, I don't think Devon Still is a Top10 pick, although that could change.. and I don't really like the idea of taking an OLB in the Top10 because they are so easy to find in later rounds.

I could see us taking Quinton Coples and a CB in the 2nd like Chase Minnifield/Hosley/Gilmore. This would not be my ideal situation, but I can see it as a possibility if we end up picking at #10ish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should trade down and take Devon Still. As for the DE position, Mario Williams could be available. (In the trade down, with the extra pick, we could get Melvin Ingram) Imagine our d-line with Mario Williams, Devon Still, Melvin Ingram, and Charles Johnson.:willy_nilly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should trade down and take Devon Still. As for the DE position, Mario Williams could be available. (In the trade down, with the extra pick, we could get Melvin Ingram) Imagine our d-line with Mario Williams, Devon Still, Melvin Ingram, and Charles Johnson.:willy_nilly:

we can't afford mario williams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if claiborne is not there I see us trying to trade down to add a second round pick. Unless of course we stay with the 4-3 (i hope not) but then couples or even better still would be a good option!

Rivera said we are keeping our base defense at 4-3, but going to give additional 3-4 looks.. so a multi-purpose player like Coples whom can play both techniques would be invaluable I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a big fan of Coples. I watched a good bit of UNC's games this year and he never popped off the screen. I agree he has a lot of talent, he just doesn't pass the eyeball test.

Plus, he got 4 of his 7.5 sacks against James Madison and Duke. Disappears in big games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera said we are keeping our base defense at 4-3, but going to give additional 3-4 looks.. so a multi-purpose player like Coples whom can play both techniques would be invaluable I suppose.

Yes for this year but Rivera and the DC said that they were forced to run the 4-3 because of the lack of training camp an oat's and because of the loss of key personnel i fully except the opposite to be the case next year with a base 3-4 defense and 4-3 looks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should trade down and take Devon Still. As for the DE position, Mario Williams could be available. (In the trade down, with the extra pick, we could get Melvin Ingram) Imagine our d-line with Mario Williams, Devon Still, Melvin Ingram, and Charles Johnson.:willy_nilly:

Melvin Ingram isn't much of a DT. He only moves inside for pass rushing situations to have him, Jadeveon Clowney, and Devin Taylor all rushing the QB. He's big enough to do that in college but wouldn't be able to in the NFL. He is a tremendous DE who is an all-around playmaker though. I would love to have him but he is just not at a position of need. The only reason we should take Ingram is if they think they could mold him into an OLB which is possible but probably stretching it. He is a lot like Dwight Freeney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a big fan of Coples. I watched a good bit of UNC's games this year and he never popped off the screen. I agree he has a lot of talent, he just doesn't pass the eyeball test.

Plus, he got 4 of his 7.5 sacks against James Madison and Duke. Disappears in big games.

That is good insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes for this year but Rivera and the DC said that they were forced to run the 4-3 because of the lack of training camp an oat's and because of the loss of key personnel i fully except the opposite to be the case next year with a base 3-4 defense and 4-3 looks!

I am not sure about that. Fua is not a 3-4 dlineman.. McClain might be able to play the 5 tech, but not sure... I don't think we waste a 3rd rounder on Fua if we plan on switching to the 34.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...