Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Hell that must freeze over for the Panthers to make the playoffs


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

The following things must happen:

1) We win out. There is no scenario that gets us in without winning out. (ATL, Hou, TB, NO)

2) Atlanta loses 3 of 4 of their remaining games. (Car, Jac, NO, TB)

3) Detroit must lose out (or lose 3 & tie 1) (Min, Oak, SD, GB)

Could have missed something- http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/playoffscenario?algorithm=WinningPct

But hell thats enough, fun thought though. Hopefully next year we'll be in a 'win and you're in' situation.

Yes I'm bored.

1) Possible

2) Not possible (Possible, No way in hell, Probable, Same as Jax)

3) Don't see it, but more likely than ATL (Possible, Possible, Not probable, Possible)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is many possibilities.

Either Chicago loses out or either Detroit loses the remainder of their games. Which team do you think has a chance of doing that?

Panthers has to win out.

Falcons has to lose the 2 of the last 4.

1. Packers - 16-0

2. 49ers -14-2

3. Saints - 12-4

4. Cowboys - 9-7 or Higher (We need to the Cowgirls to sweep the NY Giants to win the division. If they can't sweep them, we need them to have a better record than them in the end.)

WILDCARD TEAMS

5. Lions/Bears - 8-8 or higher (It can only be one or the other. I pick the Lions because I can really see Chicago losing the remainder of their games. Also the Lions can still make the playoffs with winning 1 out of their last 4 games

6. Panthers - 8-8 (Simply put...we must win out.)

We would face the Saints in the Wild-Card round :)

We do have a shot. The two major questions is this.

Out of Chicago or the Lions, which one do you believe can lose the remainder of their games? The next question is do you believe the Panthers can win the remainder of their games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not blowing the Detroit game would've really helped out slim chance. On 2nd thought, not blowing half the games would've. Frustrating year, but gotta love the potential.

Games we SHOULD have won: Arizona, Minnesota

Games we PROBABLY could have won: Chicago

Games that we were in, but PROBABLY wouldn't have won without some luck: Packers and Saints

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys know that three teams from the same division are allowed to go to the playoffs, right? Atlanta being the 5th seed and us being the 6th is more likely than anything else I've seen you guys post.

Don't the Bears, Giants, and Lions have to lose a lot for another scenario?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys know that three teams from the same division are allowed to go to the playoffs, right? Atlanta being the 5th seed and us being the 6th is more likely than anything else I've seen you guys post.

6th seed? I'll take it.

Yo we got this!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't the Bears, Giants, and Lions have to lose a lot for another scenario?

The Bears have fallen apart. Detroit is in a tailspin. Giants have 6 wins and a tough schedule. I can see the benefit in pulling for Atlanta to lose-we would hold the tiebreaker over them if we did our business and didn't kill ourselves-but I don't believe it's the only way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...