Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Is Armanti Edwards Still Returning Punts?


Panthers128

Recommended Posts

They're trying to see if he has any value at all to this team. I personally think you keep him on as the third QB and release Pickles, at least he has some skill however slight.

Totally agree.

Only keep 2 QB's on the roster and keep Edwards on as a reciever, ST player and emergency/wildcat QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's a garbage player and if we murdered every piece of poo who went to that joke of a "university" the world would be a better place

Nice to know you think my death would make the world a better place...you, sir, have some hate in your heart you need to get rid of, ASAP.

As far as AE is concerned, he's had the right attitude and I do believe he has worked hard, but with as many opportunities as he's had this season, it's obvious the experiment just isn't working. I see no way at all he makes the team next season, and to be honest, it would be best for all parties involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to know you think my death would make the world a better place...you, sir, have some hate in your heart you need to get rid of, ASAP.

Well you've got to remember his name is "Keith Moon's Liver" which tells us several things:

1: He's british, so that gives him a bitter inferiority complex to begin with

2: He's not functioning correctly

and 3: He's spent a lot of time inside another man...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I facepalmed when we made that trade and then drafted Armanti, but I hoped for the best. The guy was a phenom at App State. No doubt about it.

Unfortunately, at this point, it's pretty clear that it's not gonna work out. He better make some huge strides this offseason or he'll be looking for a job next season.

To be clear, I don't blame it on him. It's on Hurney. Hurney drafted the guy to play a position he hadn't played since he dabbled there in HS. That's a big risk move, not a move you trade a future #2 to try. Armanti should've been a late round draft pick that was looked at as a potential move to WR or a wildcat QB. He's a guy who was probably bound for the CFL as a QB and very well may could've had a very successful career there as a QB. Now, due to our investment and stubborness, he's going to be years removed from playing that position too. I think he could've been a great CFL QB. Nothing wrong with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad none of you run an NFL team. None of you Madden arm chair general mangers know what it takes to be an NFL player.

Personally I have no problem keeping Edwards. He may not be averaging big numbers but he isnt muffing punts or fumbling the ball either. And when they do actaully block for him he has had some nice returns.

Edwards has a better chance of being on this team next year than Clausen. Now how many could have predicted that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad none of you run an NFL team. None of you Madden arm chair general mangers know what it takes to be an NFL player.

Personally I have no problem keeping Edwards. He may not be averaging big numbers but he isnt muffing punts or fumbling the ball either. And when they do actaully block for him he has had some nice returns.

Edwards has a better chance of being on this team next year than Clausen. Now how many could have predicted that

if you want to settle for a guy to just catch a punt and sacrifice any attempt at better field position, then yeah, Armanti is your guy.

I like to hope our coaching staff isn't going to settle for mediocrity and will try to find a player who can play at the NFL level.. Your right, not many can do it. But you're wrong, only those who can get to have a job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its Armantis fault that he got drafted where he did, Its his fault this is the first year hes returned punts.

And it really his his fault hes never muffed a punt, and made HUGE strides during the off season in the WR position

so i agree because of what we gave up to get him he doesn't deserve time to develop, that would be asinine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...