Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

i like j stew.. but


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

Guest trollface.jpg

Doesnt Minnesota have a pretty good running back? i mean i know he got injured but they are probably hoping he comes back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they say he will be back.. BUT.. even if he is.. then how long before they take that knee out again?? they need a back. trading them the second round pick is good for us and them.. gets them a good RB thats proven and eliminates the spot they are in with who to draft.. they can focus soley on what they were before AP went down.

dont get me wrong.. i really like jonathan stewart. but their are several DB's that could go in the second round.. taking Minnesota's pick puts us higher in the round and i think we can get plenty of work out 34. with cam back there.. we get a good WR, 2-3 good DB's get our LBs back next year and were golden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Building this team won't involve separating Double Trouble....That's already been decided with the huge DeAngelo deal, IMHO....Roster gains will come from elsewhere...they are integral parts and insurance wrapped into one...I'd rather they leave them on the roster together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i tend to agree with you.. but whats better.. keeping 2 top tier runnning backs, when we really only need 1.. or drafting a bad ass returner or the next darrelle revis... of course my whole arguement revolves around the fact that i dont think AP will be ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
    • If you pay Bryce $50M a year you greatly limit your ability to put the type of team around him you need to have to have a chance to win. THAT is the problem. Hell, we can't win with him on a rookie contract. How the hell are we supposed to start winning with him paying him like a franchise QB and having to make tough roster decisions to accommodate his cap hit? 
×
×
  • Create New...