Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NC state fans


SOJA

Recommended Posts

As said above he's a Soph. Would love to add him the following year, though I hope we have our CB situation solved by then. He's listed as 6'3"...no chance. I've stood beside him on campus and at parties and no way he is that tall.

They have a habit of doing this. Audie Cole is listed at 6'5", but he claims that he is only 6'3".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ncstateo.jpg

41 Milton Hall DB So. HS 5-9/181 Burlington, NC (Williams HS)

27 Earl Wolff S Jr. 2V 6-0/201 Raeford, NC (Hoke County HS)

25 Dontae Johnson S So. 6-3/190 Pennington, NJ (Pennington Prep)

1 David Amerson CB So. 6-3/194 Greensboro, NC (Dudley HS)

NC State is horrible at bumping height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a habit of doing this. Audie Cole is listed at 6'5", but he claims that he is only 6'3".

That is just what he told me, but I swear he does look bigger than that.

ncstateo.jpg

41 Dwayne Maddoz LB Sr. 6-2/234 Shelby, NC (Crest HS)

27 Earl Wolff S Jr. 2V 6-0/201 Raeford, NC (Hoke County HS)

25 Dontae Johnson S So. 6-3/190 Pennington, NJ (Pennington Prep)

1 David Amerson CB So. 6-3/194 Greensboro, NC (Dudley HS)

NC State is horrible at bumping height.

Fixed.

But it does happen a good bit. I used to see Russell Wilson at the atrium a lot a few years ago, and he was AT MOST my height (5'10''). I will be absolutely dumbfounded if he comes back from the combine and he's anything over that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...