Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld.com's View on the Panthers draft needs...


Lone Buc Fan

Recommended Posts

1. CB: The Panthers' secondary needs more depth now that they've lost Ken Lucas so they're likely to focus on corners that will shore up their talent base.

2. QB: Jake Delhomme had a successful return from Tommy John surgery but the Panthers might need to start looking towards the future and groom their next QB.

3. DE: Julius Peppers was slapped with the franchise tag but he's likely to jet from Carolina before long, meaning a DE of the future could be a smart pick for the Panthers.

Agree, or disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. CB: The Panthers' secondary needs more depth now that they've lost Ken Lucas so they're likely to focus on corners that will shore up their talent base.

2. QB: Jake Delhomme had a successful return from Tommy John surgery but the Panthers might need to start looking towards the future and groom their next QB.

3. DE: Julius Peppers was slapped with the franchise tag but he's likely to jet from Carolina before long, meaning a DE of the future could be a smart pick for the Panthers.

Agree, or disagree?

This sounds to me like a not-so-informed opinion. It sounds like someone who read the three biggest headlines since the playoffs started and then made a list based on these three headlines:

1) Delhomme throws five interceptions in playoff loss vs. the Cardinals.

2) Peppers wants out of Carolina; requests trade

3) Unable to find trade partner, Panthers release Ken Lucas

It's not a laughable assessment, but it's not good. It just shows that this person doesn't really know much about this organization, the front office, our depth chart, or some of last year's depth that will be relied upon next year (see Richard Marshall, C.J. Wilson, Charles Johnson, etc.) There are probably at least fifty people on this forum that could give a better and more accurate assessment of our draft needs.

Please, don't let this thread turn into another "these are our biggest needs" thread...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's pretty easy to figure out the good draft lists from the bad. If they have us taking a QB early they generally don't know what they're talking about. I seriously doubt we take a QB in any round, much less have it as our #2 priority.

Agreed. Although the other 2 are not bad but in the wrong order.

I would go

1) DT

2) DE

3) CB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

any article that doesn't state DT as the #1 need is wrong, after that it's all a matter of opinion but i think it is obvious we need a defensive tackle

i think a lot of the media thinks we need a QB and they are entitled to that opinion, so it's not wrong for them to say we need one, the only reason we don't list QB as a need is because we know fox won't draft one high

at least they've calmed down with the TE position, except for Mel Kiper Jr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How big the need for DE is really depends on what happens with Peppers. As of now I see it as #1: DT #2: CB.

I don't think it's a horrid year for CBs actually. Granted, the top level talent for CBs is really weak, but it seems very deep as far as mid-level talent goes. I wouldn't want to use a 1st on any of the CBs this year, but we should be able to get a solid guy in the 2nd-4th round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pep leaves:

With Ron Meeks coming in, I feel he may have more of an impact with our current players (our current DEs in particular). With that said, I definitely feel good about Johnson stepping up into a starter role and Tyler Brayton getting better after one full year as a DE. Therefore, I feel our biggest need on defense is DT (purpose being he can sub in for Lewis and groom him in the pass rush, but utilize him in run stopping.)

If Pep stays,

Then DE definitely isn't a need because I really feel Johnson will come into his own this year and Brayton is always there. We did half decent at pass rushing with them. I still think we go DT for the same purpose as written above.

Just my reasons in both situations why DE isn't as high of a need.

1. BPA

2. BPA

3. BPA

:smilewinkgrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Pep leaves:

With Ron Meeks coming in, I feel he may have more of an impact with our current players (our current DEs in particular). With that said, I definitely feel good about Johnson stepping up into a starter role and Tyler Brayton getting better after one full year as a DE.

Damn, you're saying we can let our best pass rusher go and not do anything to replace him? Lordy... Brayton, Johnson, Hilee Taylor as our only DEs = :ee: If either of our two starters got hurt you're looking at a 7th round situation player in as an every down starter.

We're thin at DE already. If Peppers leaves we need to use a first day pick on someone to fill that void as well as adding a later round and/or veteran DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, you're saying we can let our best pass rusher go and not do anything to replace him? Lordy... Brayton, Johnson, Hilee Taylor as our only DEs = :ee: If either of our two starters got hurt you're looking at a 7th round situation player in as an every down starter.

We're thin at DE already. If Peppers leaves we need to use a first day pick on someone to fill that void as well as adding a later round and/or veteran DE.

Yep. With Peppers we are okay, without him we either need a pocket collapsing DT who can get us 6-8 sacks or a DE who can do the same maybe both. We need some veteran or draft backups at both DE and DT. Don't forget with Hangartner and Omilaye gone we are thin on the offensive line as well. Definitely the line. After that BPA of the positions noted including CB, QB, HB or whatever is out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Carolina could develop their secondary enough to break plays up consistently then the defensive line wouldn't be as big of a issue as you have solid starting linebackers in place. Seemed like your secondary is great at stopping the YAC, but they still allowed the catch to be made and would keep the chains moving and keep your defense on the field longer.

So either improve the coverage, or improve the pass rush as a whole. One or the other and your defense is top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...