Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching move rule question


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

OK, thought that a team could not deny a coach a chance to interview for a position that would be a promotion.

But this:

The Steelers denied Butler the chance to interview for the Arizona Cardinals' defensive coordinator position last season. However, Butler's contract expired after this season, allowing Butler to interview for other jobs without the Steelers blocking any move.

So, what is the rule on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the rule is unless the promotion is to HC, a team can deny an interview for a coordinator or assistant coach under contract. Whether it's a lateral move (DC to DC) or a promotion (LB coach to DC). The only thing they don't have the power to deny is an interview for a HC vacancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

between the end of a team's season and march 1(?) no team can deny another team permission to talk to their coach about a promotion. after that date in march teams are allowed to deny permission.

also, if you allow one team a chance to interview your coach you can't deny any other team permission. e.g., if you gave permission to the bills to talk to shula about taking over their OC job there and then the bucs came asking permission you would have to grant it. you can't pick and choose who you let talk to your coaches. permission to one is permission to all.

from the 2009 NFL Anti-Tampering Policy page 7

Head-Coaching Opportunity. If a club is interested in discussing its head

coaching position with an assistant coach whose playing season (excluding Pro

Bowl) is over, and who is contractually obligated to another club, the assistant

coach’s employer club must permit the coach the opportunity to discuss, and

possibly accept, such employment through March 1 of any year. After March 1,

the employer club is under no obligation to grant such permission, but it may be

voluntarily granted at the employer club’s discretion during the off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

between the end of a team's season and march 1(?) no team can deny another team permission to talk to their coach about a promotion. after that date in march teams are allowed to deny permission.

also, if you allow one team a chance to interview your coach you can't deny any other team permission. e.g., if you gave permission to the bills to talk to shula about taking over their OC job there and then the bucs came asking permission you would have to grant it. you can't pick and choose who you let talk to your coaches. permission to one is permission to all.

from the 2009 NFL Anti-Tampering Policy page 7

This applies to HC opportunities only, not all promotions. So Raging Bull's answer combined with your clarification on timing provides the complete answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can deny assistant coaches under contract interviewing for any assitant coaching vacancy with another team. No one really denies any HC interviews, and even those can be denied but no one does it because it could happen to them.

Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can deny assistant coaches under contract interviewing for any assitant coaching vacancy with another team. No one really denies any HC interviews, and even those can be denied but no one does it because it could happen to them.

Right?

No. Other than post-March 1st as outlined in Rayzor's post above, you cannot deny a request for one of your staffers to interview for head coach. You can deny anything other than for HC, whether it is a promotion or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...