Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Change the mascot?


tarheelpride

Recommended Posts

No, this is not a uniform thread, and I haven't seen this discussed much (and none as of late, unless I missed it)

Ignore the quality of the article, but it did get me thinking a bit. Since we changed the logo some, should we change the mascot as well to reflect the more aggressive nature?

Or is it one of those things that nobody give a rat's ass about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mascots are designed to appeal to little kids and as such i doubt sir purr is going to be screwed around with

of course there are people who don't understand this and think he should drive a tank that sprays jim beam from a fire hose and launches fleshlights into the stands during pregame but what can you do.

This is quite possibly the truest thing ever posted on the Huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mascots are designed to appeal to little kids and as such i doubt sir purr is going to be screwed around with

of course there are people who don't understand this and think he should drive a tank that sprays jim beam from a fire hose and launches fleshlights into the stands during pregame but what can you do.

rep for fleshlight comment. the visual in my head is hilarious. Pocket pussies hitting fans in the face, fights breaking out etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mascots are designed to appeal to little kids and as such i doubt sir purr is going to be screwed around with

of course there are people who don't understand this and think he should drive a tank that sprays jim beam from a fire hose and launches fleshlights into the stands during pregame but what can you do.

absolutely correct.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Ok cool, then we get Jalon Walker or Mykel Williams.  Having an elite WR is cool if you have a decent QB to get him the ball. Hell, the Vikings have THE best WR in the league and still can't do sh*t because McCarthy is trash. And there's no guarantee we don't draft Tet even had we drafted Ladd. Either way, that combo of Ladd + Tet or Walker would have changed the trajectory of this team. But no, we not only trade up for Legette, but chose the wrong WR. Where have I've heard this before?
    • They really would have been a perfect pairing of WRs as they're both so good, yet complete opposite types of players.  But with all our holes on defense, if Ladd showed the same potential had we drafted him, no way they could have justified going WR again, even I might have been against it (okay, we all know that's not true, I'd still haver taken my guy, but I'd at least have admitted it wasn't smart).    
    • They try so hard to be the smartest ones in the room rather than taking the players that are more obviously going to be good. I think that is largely driven by who the owner is. They want to do it "their" way, but their way has been wrong a whole lot more than it has been right. 
×
×
  • Create New...