Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther's #1Fan Mock Draft

Panther's #1 Fan

By Panther's #1 Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Panther's #1 Fan Newbie

Panther's #1 Fan

Posted
Posted

Here is what I think would be the best possible draft for our Carolina Panthers

Rd1) Melvin Ingram, DE, South Carolina

I know it may be different, but we desperately need to improve our pass rush really helps the secondary helps hide whatever flaws we currently have back there until we can find and develop some corners. Get the qb on the ground he cant throw it from there etc...

Rd2) Kelechi Osemele, OT/G, Iowa State

Probably the most versatile ol in the draft can play any position on the line ,but center has played LT this entire year and was dominant

Rd4) Donnie Fletcher, CB, Boston College

6'0 200 lb corner with great coverage skills that could challenge Cap day 1 or transition to fs whichever is needed

Rd5) Nigel Bradham, OLB, Florida State

Great athletic linebacker that can cover wlb prototype can challenge a gimpy T.D. day 1 led FSU in tackles 3years in a row

Rd6) Philip Lutzenkirchen, TE, Auburn

Just in case we don't bring Shock back this would be a great insurance pick for Barnidge that is still yet to prove himself. Lutzenkirchen is uderated has sneaky speed and dependable Hands as well as a good blocker and is familiar with Cam probably his favorite target in college

Rd7) T.J. Graham, WR, North Carolina State

Good special teamer and underated with 757 yards and 7 touchdowns this year with a mediocre qb in my opinion

I did not pickup a dt because we are stacked at the position and have a lot of youth there would like to see onè more year with the group or bring in another veteran rather than get younger.Brokers is extremely over hyped is too raw to be considered a top 10 pick he should have stayed in school in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iskassim06 Newbie

iskassim06

Posted
Posted

I like the idea of having another Charles Johnson opposite Charles Johnson and picking up an OL but I think we have to go corner on the second pick unless we wait for Trumaine in the 4th and he may not be there. Plus Schwartz is available in 6. I think the TE is returning for his senior season but I think we retain Shockey this yr and next year we can look to that postion. TJ is an absolute steal in the 7th.. He has the speed to stretch the field and can return punts and kicks alongside Pilares. I like the draft. But if Coples was available I say we take him but if we do trade down and Ingram is there we should snag him because his motor is ridiculously high and plays hard every down. Overall, good mock. I would give a B+ glad u didnt have us take a punter..cuz we can get a udfa

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted

Why not?

I think the first round pick is a reach and is not a real good fit for the scheme. There is very low potential of him being an immediate impact . Then we go to the second round where we pick a guy that is probably worthy of the position but coupled with the first round pick it seems weak. End result is that neither of the two picks address a huge need and neither can make a big splash.

Dont get me wrong, I think both guys can be good but I dont think that is the way we should go.

Also don't know if the TE is right.

But its refreshing to see someone go in a good direction if for nothing else a good difference of opinion. I also like waiting for UDFA to get a washed up soccer player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panther's #1 Fan Newbie

Panther's #1 Fan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ingram isn't even 6'2 he is a 3-4 olb and we pick way to high for him it would be a hue reach.

He can play a olb in a 3-4 exactly but he has played dt and de for the most part at SC most olb are de's just standing up Ingram will be a top 11 pick believe it or not both of th first two picks would be starters on this team no doubt about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackofalltrades Proficient

Jackofalltrades

Posted
Posted

I don't like tweeners, especially in the first round.

I also don't like role players in the top 10. I want an every down. I love his energy and burst, but I really think he's best suited for a Von Miller/Clay Mathews type role and we just don't use 3-4 looks enough to justify it.

Not a fan of any OL in the top two rounds unless Kalil should fall, which he won't. We have a very good OL now and are bringing a couple of quality starters back from IR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

Rd1) Melvin Ingram, DE, South Carolina

I know it may be different, but we desperately need to improve our pass rush really helps the secondary helps hide whatever flaws we currently have back there until we can find and develop some corners. Get the qb on the ground he cant throw it from there etc...

I did not pickup a dt because we are stacked at the position and have a lot of youth there would like to see onè more year with the group or bring in another veteran rather than get younger.Brokers is extremely over hyped is too raw to be considered a top 10 pick he should have stayed in school in my opinion.

We are far from stacked at DT. The giants are a team that's stacked at DT. They just pressured Brady well enough to keep the pats under 20 and they didn't even have marvin austin in the rotation which is scary, especially since brady plays behind one of the best lines in football.

Also your brockers comment is so very very wrong. So essentially, he's not good enough this year that he should stay in school, but if he's overhyped that means if he returns he shouldn't progress as a player. Here we have an opportunity to draft a guy whom would very likely raise his stock if he stayed for his junior season, which would require a higher pick, and you think he's not worth investing in with a lower pick because he's too raw? poo if i'm ron rivera i'm drafting a guy who looks as good as he does playing raw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

We are far from stacked at DT. The giants are a team that's stacked at DT. They just pressured Brady well enough to keep the pats under 20 and they didn't even have marvin austin in the rotation which is scary, especially since brady plays behind one of the best lines in football.

Also your brockers comment is so very very wrong. So essentially, he's not good enough this year that he should stay in school, but if he's overhyped that means if he returns he shouldn't progress as a player. Here we have an opportunity to draft a guy whom would very likely raise his stock if he stayed for his junior season, which would require a higher pick, and you think he's not worth investing in with a lower pick because he's too raw? poo if i'm ron rivera i'm drafting a guy who looks as good as he does playing raw.

absolutely.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By strato · Posted

      To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • UnluckyforSome
      2025 College Football Thread

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • CRA
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By CRA · Posted

      The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...