Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South most improved players of 2011


Mr Mojo Risin

Recommended Posts

Not sure of what the link is but I saw this posted on another board. It brings up an interesting topic about Gaither do you guys think he can step in as that 3rd lb? Also do you think Andersons play was his fault or the fault of not having much talent on the defensive side of the ball? I think Anderson will improve next year because he will be playing with starting caliber NFL players (I hope). Anyways here are the NFCS most improved players I thought it was an interesting read.

NFC South

Atlanta Falcons

Most Improved

Sean Weatherspoon: From -10.2 (2010) to +20.4 (2011)

The Falcons were probably a little relieved when a non-serious injury meant they could afford to limit the amount of snaps they had to give Weatherspoon as a rookie. All too often out of place, he wasn’t able to put his physical talents to use in 2010. Fast forward a year and Weatherspoon looks like one of the best linebackers in the league. He could stand to improve in coverage, but his knack for making big stops and getting off blocks is impressive, and exactly what you’d expect out of a first round pick.

Biggest drop off

Kroy Biermann: From +12.7 to -10.1

You had to feel bad for Biermann. Here’s a player who constantly picked up pressure in 2010, yet the whole world seemed to be clamoring for his role to be reduced. It did with the arrival of Ray Edwards, and it led to the Falcons getting far less pressure on the other side of John Abraham then they anticipated for. Biermann didn’t seem to respond to the reduced role, and had something of a year to forget. On 92 fewer pass rushes, he picked-up 23 fewer QB disruptions. Would the Falcons have been better off keeping Biermann and not spending on Edwards? We’ll never know, but it’s a question their money men must be asking.

More snaps needed

Stephen Nicholas: +5.9 from 286 snaps

Atlanta didn’t get as much production from their pass rush as they had hoped, especially in their sub package defense on 3rd-and-long. Part of the problem came the lack of push up the middle from anyone not named Jonathan Babineaux. One way to counter this would be to get a bit more creative and use more 3-3-5 alignments, as had seemingly become the norm in 2010. Nicholas, who missed time through injury as well, would fit in very handily as one of these three linebackers, as he and Weatherspoon displayed an ability to generate pressure off the edge. However they do it, the Nicholas’ play seems to dictate he should be a bigger part of the defense.

__________________________________________________________________________

Carolina Panthers

Most Improved

Steve Smith: From -7.8 to +11.7

And here is why you don’t give up on talented players. As much as it appeared Smith was angling for a move after the 2010 season, a far greater concern for him should have been his performance. The erratic QB displays he was subjected to didn’t help, but he has to take a degree of responsibility for his failings. That was all a thing of the past as he rolled back the years on his way to our eighth-highest receiving grade of all wide outs. Still one of the most dangerous receivers in the league.

Biggest drop off

James Anderson: From +14.1 to -2.3

If 2010 was what Anderson is capable of, then 2011 was very much a letdown. Gone were the big plays that made Anderson stand out on a bad team, replaced with too many missed tackles (13) and not enough defensive stops (13 fewer than in 2010). Sometimes living up to a new contract can be something of a burden, and Anderson appears a prime example of this.

More snaps needed

Omar Gaither: +2.1 from 241 snaps

As we see more nickel and sub package defenses, it does, to a degree, help disguise the limitations of some linebackers. Gaither is one of those linebackers; excellent against the run and exploitable in coverage. He’s good enough to start, but not such that you want teams to be able to key in on him every down. So with the Panthers possibly re-tooling their linebacker group and Thomas Davis possibly on the way out, is there room for Gaither to get a full time starting job in the Panthers’ base? Carolina had a lot of linebackers get playing time last year, so it may be another team that gets the best use out of Gaither.

__________________________________________________________________________

New Orleans Saints

Most Improved

Jermon Bushrod: From -28.8 to +0.5

Let’s not go overboard, Bushrod in no way, shape or form deserved to make it to the Pro Bowl. He still benefits from playing in an offense that gets rid of the ball quickly, and is far from dominating. But he’s not the liability he once was, cutting back the number of QB disruptions he gave up despite having to spend more snaps in pass protection. He’ll never be a mauler at tackle, and losing Carl Nicks could possibly hurt him going forward, but he proved this year he can at least slow down the pass rushers he once seemed intent on ushering through to his QB.

Biggest drop off

Roman Harper: From +0.7 to -17.8

It may seem odd to be so critical of Harper in a year where he picked up nine sacks (including playoffs). Well, ignore that for a second, because that number owes to blitzing 153 times and to teams not picking him up (eight of his sacks were unblocked). Instead, focus on how Harper, a safety, struggled so much in coverage. Harper, who gave up six touchdowns, just can’t keep up with backs and tight ends and was found out on more than one occasion in the Saints’ aggressive scheme.

More snaps needed

Chris Ivory: +5.2 from 156 snaps

The problem for Ivory is there are three other running backs who could probably handle more snaps. It’s a shame because he has proved over the past two years he can pick up yards, with his 4.4 yards per carry being greatly assisted by forcing 14 missed tackles on his 101 attempts. Ivory may need to move elsewhere to see snaps, but at the very least, he looks like an excellent complement to a feature back at the RB spot.

__________________________________________________________________________

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Most Improved

Michael Bennett: From -5.7 to +26.0

One of the few success stories of the 2011 season for the Buccaneers was the play of DLE Bennett. Unheralded–and then some–heading into the year, Bennett stepped up with a series of performances that should ensure the Bucs lock him down for the future. What most impressed us was how he was able to get plenty of pressure while playing the run so well. His dominance of the Colts in Week 4 showing just what he is capable of.

Biggest drop off

Quincy Black: From +8.1 to -20.9

Ronde Barber earned some serious consideration as he looked to have played one season too many, but for sheer ineptitude, Black takes it. Fresh off getting massively overpaid relative to his work on the field, Black contrived to miss 16 tackles, over-pursue numerous plays, and look anything but cut out for a three-down role. A real failure for Bucs management to put so much money in a player with such a limited body of work.

More snaps needed

Gerald McCoy: +5.5 from 228 snaps

How different could the Bucs year have been if McCoy hadn’t been lost for the year? The talented DT looks the kind of every-down player who can make plays regardless of what the offense is doing. One of the biggest things the new coaching staff can do is ensure McCoy is healthy, because if Tampa Bay is to challenge the powerhouses of the NFC South, they need players like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think it's a slap to Smitty's face to call him most improved. He was always that good, it's just that no one could get him the ball. Stats don't suddenly make him the best again, it's bullsh1t.

I thought LaFell was most improved.

I agree but to a certain point. Smitty had what 46 catches for 546 yards and 2 tds last year? or something close to that and then this year he posts 79 catchers for almost 1400 yards and 7 tds who else on our team would you name most improved? only other one I could see is Gamble but Gamble isn't getting anywhere near the recognition he deserves so really only leaves smitty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

their most improved stuff is based on that numerical grade they give out

i don't get the whole sabremetric thing they try doing. too many variables in a football game compared to baseball. i really only use pff to see the stats they tally like pressures and whatnot... not for their own analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree but to a certain point. Smitty had what 46 catches for 546 yards and 2 tds last year? or something close to that and then this year he posts 79 catchers for almost 1400 yards and 7 tds who else on our team would you name most improved? only other one I could see is Gamble but Gamble isn't getting anywhere near the recognition he deserves so really only leaves smitty.

smith can only catch what is thrown accurate enough to give him a fair chance

last year he really had nobody that could throw an accurate pass to him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smith can only catch what is thrown accurate enough to give him a fair chance

last year he really had nobody that could throw an accurate pass to him

i know i agree that offense last year was close to being the worst offense in NFL history but like i said his numbers this year completely crushed his numbers compared to last year almost tripled his yards tripled his tds i honestly don't know who else i would put as the most improved over smith who would you choose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...