Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

GBN's latest


stirs

Recommended Posts

If the first 8 picks go the way of this mock (Claiborne, Kalil, Coples, and Reiff off the board), I think you have to take Brockers. The ONLY other choice (if you can't trade back) might be Jenkins.

Ingram is a good player, but I still see him as more of a 3-4 LB......but he MIGHT be in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. OT wanters: too high for Martin and Adams. CB wanters: Too high for Jenkins and Kirkpatrick. DE wanters: A bit early for Upshaw or Ingram if you want them as a 4-3 DE (maybe not too early for 3-4 teams), and there are no OLBs or S worth a crack. Too early for DeCastro as well.

Brockers, however, might be a solid chip to play in seeking a trade (if you do not want Brockers). I hear NE would love him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone else find it amusing that every single mock has the dolphins picking before us? The media has so little respect for the Panthers that they don't even give us a chance to win a 50/50 coin toss

/rant

i find it more amusing that anyone would look to this as a sign of some kind of bias against the panthers.

/shoulder shrug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It kinda comes down to what we all know at this time. After Jacksonville, there are picks that will be valued all over the board. Jenkins at 9 or 17? Same with Still, Brockers, DeCastro and everyone else. Just doubt there will be a trade down scenario, so we will just have to like someone better at our pick and live with it.

Brockers would be my pick in this scenario also because of potential. Think Jenkins has reached his ceiling and we can get a good, not great CB in round 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. OT wanters: too high for Martin and Adams. CB wanters: Too high for Jenkins and Kirkpatrick. DE wanters: A bit early for Upshaw or Ingram if you want them as a 4-3 DE (maybe not too early for 3-4 teams), and there are no OLBs or S worth a crack. Too early for DeCastro as well.

Brockers, however, might be a solid chip to play in seeking a trade (if you do not want Brockers). I hear NE would love him.

Assuming its too early for any player mentioned is silly.I am guessing you are basing that opinion on mock drafts that you have seen.

Those mocks are never close to accurate outside of the top 5 or so. If its too early for them, then who do you think its not too early for? Do you see what I'm saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...