-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or GoogleĀ accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.Ā
Members receive fewer adsĀ , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
Ā
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out.Ā Canalesā offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.Ā Ā -
-
By TylerDurden · Posted
Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didnāt take any timeouts on their last drive. Ā I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it wouldāve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it couldāve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.