Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With Shockey Gone


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

we really need to resign shockey, losing him would be huge. we need 2 reliable TEs with how our offense is run and we've got nobody after olsen. barnidge is more for STs, he's never produced as a TE. shockey brings experience, veteran leadership, toughness, attitude, and he's a better blocker than olsen along with what he adds to the receiving game.

if he signs elsewhere and we are stuck rolling the dice with barnidge then i'd consider that a pretty big f**kup by the FO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resign Shockey. See what Barnidge can do when healthy in this system. Then make move after next season

Can't afford to do this.

That would give you Olsen, Shocket, Barnidge, and Hartsock....yes, Hartsock stays because of his play at H Back.

Can't afford to carry 4 TE's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't afford to do this.

That would give you Olsen, Shocket, Barnidge, and Hartsock....yes, Hartsock stays because of his play at H Back.

Can't afford to carry 4 TE's.

packers carried 5 TEs last year i believe? lol

considering barnidge would be looked at as a STs guy and hartsock a backup FB I think it's doable. roster space shouldn't be an issue and even if it is you can always dump hartsock or barnidge before shockey. price tag is the only thing im worried about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

packers carried 5 TEs last year i believe? lol

considering barnidge would be looked at as a STs guy and hartsock a backup FB I think it's doable. roster space shouldn't be an issue and even if it is you can always dump hartsock or barnidge before shockey. price tag is the only thing im worried about.

Barnidge is not just a ST guy. He has the size and speed to be able to stretch the seam. I am very interested in seeing what he can do in this offense.

Shockey was wanting somewhere in the $4M/season range. Not worth the cap space given how tight we are....even though I would love to have him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want shockey if only for his I'm gonna whip your ass and talk shot attitude

I want a shockey on offense and I want one on defense

We need a lot of Shockey's on defense.....too nice and soft for some time. Jenkins was the last guy with any edge to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure how much he was a long term piece of this team.   Sucks to not have him as part of the rotation.   Looks like it's Lee Hunter time.     
    • This post was an error. Oops and sorry for the errors in the previous one. Too slow to edit.   We’ll see what they do.  
    • I am not sure he will put the over the games but we’ll probably have them.   Two things I am thinking.  We have 4 preseason games.  All the coaches have enough service time to know the standards that are in place for decades. If I recall it was play your starters just a series to start woth and build it up until week theee where play a lot and you have week four to set hour roster. Evaluate before cuts.   Bevell will certainly have the whole thing down pat.   I’d they don’t do the fries and frie air will worry too. Because it is set up to do that.     I have said since they went t three preseason people have to figure a new way are still feeling it out and trying things.  We don’t have to this year.  
×
×
  • Create New...