Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney is given too much credit


megadeth078

Recommended Posts

Our main interest in free agency this offseason was special teams ace and former charger Steve Gregory. While many thought having our interests focused primarily on a special teams player during the FA period was nothing short of pathetic, people with a brain have noticed that our special teams have been consistently inconsistent for years and recognized this as Hurney's chance to finally prove to everyone that he is finally going to put some emphasis on fixing our special teams unit. After Gregory signed with us, it would have been a great situation for everyone. The haters would rejoice because they would be disappointed with signing a nobody and would have something to bitch about until the draft, and it would be great for the Hurney riders because he would be improving our team for cheap, and he would appear sensible because he's not throwing money at everything.

The result: the Patriots take all of five minutes to think about who they want and they sign who they want. I know people will say "but they gave him starter money, and we weren't looking for a new starter at safety", and I respond with "huh?". We had a chance to finally put some effort into fixing our special teams, but we bitched out because we told him we wanted him for special teams only (so we could pay him $50/game) as if our safeties are something to brag about. The Patriots don't know if he will pan out as a starter, but if things don't work out, he can always play special teams. They can do this because they actually have some money in their bank accounts. What appeared to be a low risk/high reward kind of player that can be brought in without a second thought, turns out to be a tough hurdle for Hurney to handle. Everything is a high risk situation according to poor old Hurney.

The other player we were interested in was Jason Brown (or John or whatever), the player who would help us reverse the negatives of releasing our overpaid starting OG to save ourselves the cap space (space which we'll use on something?), and when signed, would make Hurney look like a cap-saving wizard and overall sexy man. Well it turns out, Hurney lowballed the man so hard, he made Brown question his football career and maybe even question the meaning of his existence considering he had to take the weekend off to consider getting paid to play with a lemon-shaped ball. Brown has yet to call us back, not only because he was insulted and had his ego molested by Hurney, but because he was so confused that someone could actually offer him $10,000 to play an entire season in the NFL. We cut our starting OG, so we can bring in whoever else for "cheap", but football players and Hurney seem to have have two completely different ideas of the word "cheap".

Hurney isn't the magician the riders make him out to be. He's not a patient assassin lurking in the shadows waiting for the right targets to pounce on. He's not on his twitter reading Joe Person updates laughing his ass off at all the dumbasses signing players for actual money. If you don't imagine Hurney waiting by his phone facepalming every 45 minutes after agents laugh at his offers, then you got the wrong idea of our general manager. I'm not saying this proves that Hurney is incompetent though, nor am I saying that he needs to be replaced as soon as now, but face it guys, he's not a wizard, he's not a pioneer, he's not an old sage with infinite wisdom. He's not cheap either. He's broke. Talk about our cap all you want, but these are the actions of a man with no money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, the proof is...well in our team. Hurney needs to change what he is doing because we have years of proof it isn't working. You can claim you want to build a team through the draft all you want, doesn't mean you have the ability to do that.

Not only that but Hurney has made a lot of mistakes recently. I always thought he was an average GM but the longer he goes rambling on about building through the draft without actually fielding a winning team the less credit he is going to get. Average GM gets you average players and you end up with an average record (like we are). People say he nails first rounders but if you look harder you'll see his misses are also usually high picks.

I think he is overrated by panther fans but what do you expect? For me, it's not hard to imagine success without Hurney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am ashamed to be associated with the lot of you in fandom.

I will say this one last friggin' time:

HURNEY. PICKS. WHO. THE. COACHES. WANT. PERIOD.

His job is cap management. We pay what it takes to retain the players that want and deserve to be here, we don't overpay for outside talent on a whim, and we primarily build through the draft, picking players that the COACHES feel they need.

If you want a GM that picks the players that HE wants, then go look at A.J. Smith of the Chargers (who is notoriously despised through most of the league.)

This is Rivera's club now, and Hurney will pick the players Ron really feels need to be here. The only year that Hurney picked on his own was 2010, and that was because Fox was a walking lame duck. But the years before that, it was primarily Fox wanting to trade up for Otah, and Fox wanting to grab Armanti, and Fox lobbying to get Ken Lucas, and Fox wanting to let Peppers walk because he didn't feel that Peppers wanted to be here.

But Hurney's job is to manage the cap, and make money for the players that the coaches target. That's it. And he's pretty damn good at that particular task. If you're looking for a talent savant, that's really not the job Richardson wants him doing, because Hurney doesn't coach or train the players. He runs the scouting department, they put together the grades to pass to the coaching staff, and then together they figure out who and what to target. If we go the next several years with bad drafts that's going to be on Rivera, not Hurney. And I've liked what I've seen out of Rivera, I think he identifies talent very well (he was the one lusting after Cam, after all.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
    • The defense has pulled that feat off this season though.  Multiple times. offense has not had a single good first half all season.  Only and good opening scripted drive paired with disappointing play.  defense has been the actual unit you can measure real and consistent improvement IMO.  Still holes and flaws to it that aren’t going away until new bodies get here but they really are the story of the season IMO
    • One thing about RB's and LB's is they are going to get hurt. It's inevitable. Having a fresh Chuba is not a bad thing.  My only criticism of this entire situation is that I wish our staff would adjust personnel to matchup a little better. I think Chuba is a lot better than Rico against the stacked boxes we've seen the last two weeks. They are very different backs with very different strengths, and I love them both. Rico is so good at identifying the hole early, and hitting it full speed early. He's much better at breaking the big run. Chuba is a much more patient back, and finds 3 yards when there's nothing there better than Rico.  It's in no way a criticism of either, but I think Chuba would have had more success than Rico the way the Saints and Falcons attacked us from a Defensive standpoint.  When you put 9 in the box, often times there is no hole to attack. 
×
×
  • Create New...