Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Trade #9 + Stewart To Denver For...


R0CKnR0LLA

Recommended Posts

That's what I was thinking Mav. No way they trade Miller and no way I would give up our first rounder, plus a player who was a former first rounder for another player.

Miller is awesome, but how do we know Kuechly wouldn't offer similar production if we take him in the first?

If we traded one of our RBs to Foxy, we better get an early pick back... I'm pretty sure most teams wouldn't give up a first for a RB nowadays, but perhaps a 2nd or 3rd is possible. And I still wouldn't want to give up Stew for a 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Kuechly is the same player as Miller by any means, even if I am very impressed by him and wouldn't mind him being a Panther (not 100% sure I would take him at 9 but tbh I haven't followed the draft as much this year).

Fox isn't making all the personnel decisions or maybe we could get a 2nd for Stew. As it is, we'd be lucky to get a third I think with the way teams find RBs all over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Kuechly is the same player as Miller by any means, even if I am very impressed by him and wouldn't mind him being a Panther (not 100% sure I would take him at 9 but tbh I haven't followed the draft as much this year).

Fox isn't making all the personnel decisions or maybe we could get a 2nd for Stew. As it is, we'd be lucky to get a third I think with the way teams find RBs all over.

Exactly.

And no, Kuechly isn't quite the athlete Miller is, but he's no slouch either. I see a lot of the same explosion though and closing speed on the field. I don't think they'll necessarily produce the same way, but the stats may pan out similarly. So, I'd rather take a chance with our pick than not have one in the first at all.

And I think this trade is even harder to pull for the same reasons... RB is one of the easiest positions to fill over recent years through the draft and LB is much easier to address than say DT or WR. So, not enough value for either side IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...