Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3Rd Greatest Rushing Attack In Nfl History?


CRA

Recommended Posts

You could argue the 2011 Panthers were the 3rd best ground attack of the Superbowl era. Carolina averaged a league leading and impressive 5.4 yards per carry as a team. Based on Cold Hard Football Facts list of the greatest teams until 2007 and what occurred since....our Panther team would place 3rd in the Superbowl era on their list.

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_1700_The_great_ground_attacks.html

I have seen several comments in the million DWil/Stewart threads list the potential to become the greatest rushing attack of all time is a reason to keep the duo together. So I ask....is that something NFL history shows would be a good thing?

Since 2006 - 7 teams have averaged at least 5 yards per carry as a team. So that brings the count to 25 teams during the Superbowl era have averaged 5.0 yards per carry or better. When looking at the 5 yard per carry teams (25)

12 of those 25 teams had winning records.

The 25 teams combined for 6 playoff wins

0 Superbowl wins

Seems the elite passing teams have faired much better than the elite rushing teams in the Superbowl era. Without doing the research of adding in 2007 to present day to their figures.....they already account for 5 Superbowl wins based of the criteria used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we were also a top ten passing attack in 2011, something the majority of those top running attacks couldn't claim.

that's why i'm an advocate of keeping stewart, as he's clearly one of the central cogs that keeps this juggernaut running. given the way the league has transformed, i'm more than happy having more of our salary cap tied into offensive playmakers than defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're suggesting that we will never win a super bowl?

No merely pointing out the greatest rushing teams during the Superbowl era haven't done much....just pointing out being the best on the ground hasn't worked to get anyone a ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No merely pointing out the greatest rushing teams during the Superbowl era haven't done much....just pointing out being the best on the ground hasn't worked to get anyone a ring.

You sure fooled me. With all this evidence you have offered, I would surely go out on a limb and say you do not believe we will win a super bowl with our running back stable. This isn't even including Cam, who runs as well.

The way I see it, we will break the mold in the next 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we were also a top ten passing attack in 2011, something the majority of those top running attacks couldn't claim.

that's why i'm an advocate of keeping stewart, as he's clearly one of the central cogs that keeps this juggernaut running. given the way the league has transformed, i'm more than happy having more of our salary cap tied into offensive playmakers than defense.

Not sure we were a top 10 passing attack

I think balance is key though...

But if you could choose to dominate in one aspect wouldn't we prefer to build a great passing attack based off recent NFL history and during the Superbowl era?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You sure fooled me. With all this evidence you have offered, I would surely go out on a limb and say you do not believe we will win a super bowl with our running back stable. This isn't even including Cam, who runs as well.

The way I see it, we will break the mold in the next 3 years.

I think Cam can be one of the greatest of all time and win multiple rings. I just don't think building a super backfield is the means to aid him. The greatest attacks in league history haven't gotten anyone a ring.... have barely aided a QB in just winning playoff games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we were also a top ten passing attack in 2011, something the majority of those top running attacks couldn't claim.

that's why i'm an advocate of keeping stewart, as he's clearly one of the central cogs that keeps this juggernaut running. given the way the league has transformed, i'm more than happy having more of our salary cap tied into offensive playmakers than defense.

Obviously whether or not a team rushes for 5 yards a carry is unrelated to winning playoffs or Superbowls. But that has little to do with whether or not we should keep Stewart or continue to develop our running game. As you noted, we also had a top 10 passing offense (6th in yards per attempt).

Lets look at teams that had a top 10 passing game and 10 ten rushing attack and see if any teams in the last 5 years won the Superbowl. Seems to me new Orleans fits that bill.

But I think the much bigger issue here is whether a team had a top defense especially in the playoffs. Teams can get the playoffs with a good offense or defense but to win a Superbowl you need offense, defense and specials teams to all step up. When we develop a top defense then we will be playoff bound. Obviously just a good offense rarely gets you in the playoffs unless it is Patriotesque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of 46 Super Bowl Champions, only 3 of them passed for 4000 yds. So obviously, since Super Bowl Champions tend to rush for fewer than 5 yds/carry and throw for fewer than 4000 yds/year, our offense was just too damned efficient last year. It's all Chud's fault! Fire him now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you can always talk good or bad in just about everything. 8 wins and leading poo mountain, this rookie class is a big reason. Think about no Tmac or Dan Morgan didn't make that trade to gain a future 2nd rounder. So after Pat Jones breaks his back, DJ " who's not on any roster or PS" Johnson would be starting. Gods knows how bad they already are- 32nd in sacks/pressure/PDs etc... Sure Prince, Trevor, Cam, and little Jimmy haven't done too much, but they are still here.  Honestly its not smart or wise to judge rookies, *unless pro-bowl or cut. Lets revisit this next year, there are slump sophomore years and the biggest jump in players careers most times happens in the 2nd full off-season. You see who wants to be NFL pro and who's happy with teppers checks. I know many of them will be getting surgeries, got to see how they attack that as well....Tmac is playing hurt currently, if they were out of the race, he would be IR'd and maybe half the rookie class as well....I thought Cam was headed for the IR. 
    • It actually looks pretty solid.  A few players to re-sign and three primary positions to upgrade (starters).  Beyond that, we don't have a bunch of holes or need to overpay free agents. this is how I see it (using OTC for the 2026 roster information) on December 22, 2025.  This is rather basic, focusing on the core needs. Blue: Potential players to re-sign in the offseason.  Green: Players under contract for the 2026 season.  Italics: Possible cap casualties Analysis   Offense:  Center:  First, sign Mays for the long term (He is 26–I’d give him a 3-4 year deal).  He is not great, but he is decent and we need consistency on the OL. He does not make stupid mistakes. While the draft is not great in the interior offensive line, signing a veteran who can backup G and C would be a strategy.   Guard:  Canalas seemed to be impressed with Curhan, as I was.  He will be 28 next year, so he has a few years in him. I think he comes cheap and is quality depth.  He can play center, but is perhaps best at G and T.  Valuable reserve.   Tackle:  While Nijman returns as the swing T behind Moton and Ekwonu, the Panthers need to start developing a RT to play behind Moton.  A late-round draft pick that is rough but has all the tools is ideal. As the fourth OT, he can develop behind some pretty good veterans.   Wide Receiver:  We need a playmaker to play opposite TMac.  I believe in Coker, but think he is the AT-type slot. He needs to be re-signed. XL cannot be counted on to step into that role.  He is not that familiar with the WR position and he does not seem to be a student of the game.  This is a strong WR draft. First or second round.   Tight End:  I dunno.  I can see us upgrading the position, but Tremble does a lot of stuff well aside from catching the ball.  Evans is a decent all-around TE, and Sanders has some upside.  I’d love a weapon, but add the WR.   Running Back:  If Dowdle wants to be here, how do you let him walk?  He will be 28, and most RBs hit the wall then.  He deserves a big contract, but 28-year old RBs on big deals don’t earn them.  Go with Hubbard, Brooks, and Etienne.  Build the OL and the backs get better.   Quarterback:  Well, Bryce is improving and his confidence is growing.  Look at how many other QBs have taken time to get it. He is going to be the QB, regardless.  I want a young QB behind him, not the Red Senior Citizen.     Overview: Free Agent Priorities are to re-sign Mays and Coker.  I have Dowdle in blue, but I would let him walk (for reasons provided).  Cuhran played well and is versatile and should be signed if possible.  Draft a developmental OT, a raw, late-round OT.  In the draft, take a WR in rounds 1 or 2.  The offense is in tact–little needs to be done.  Let the OL develop chemistry, sign Mays while he is entering his prime, and get a weapon opposite TMac.  Give Coker a long-term deal.    Defense: ILB;  With only Wallace on the 2026 payroll, this position needs to be addressed.  Rozeboom might be able to be re-signed. I think ILB will be addressed in free agency and the draft. ILB will be the second or third round pick.  We will re-sign Rozeboom and maybe Cherulus and another priority free agent.   Edge/OLB: Scourton seems to be the real deal, but Princely (needs to develop) and Jones II are role players.  The draft is LOADED at the edge rush position.  I expect a first or second round edge player to be taken.   Defensive Tackle:  We have some big salaries at DT, and with Brown on the field, you dont need stars beside him.  I think the team cuts Robinson to get $8.5m in cap room, especially since C Jackson seems to be ready.     Cornerback:  Morgan has done a tremendous job finding talent in the bargain bins at CB.  Smith-Wade has been very solid.  Thornton seems to be a find.  Mike Jackson is a solid pro.     Safety:  Ransom seems to be the heir apparent for the Scott job, and Moehrig gives them a very aggressive, violent pair of safeties.  I like the safeties in this draft, fwiw.  I expect a late round pick.   Overview:  The Panthers must address ILB and Edge as priorities.  The ILB could be a free agent, Rozeboom re-signing, and maybe a draft pick. However, they need a pass rush more than anything else.   This is a great draft for edge players; I would not be surprised to see Dan Morgan double dip at edge.  Depth at S.   As soon as the season is over, look for Morgan to re-sign Mays, Coker, Cuhran, and possibly Rozeboom and Dowdle.  That would lock up the starting C, #3/slot WR, versatile depth on the OL, and get your leading tackler back at ILB.  Three HUGE moves that sould not break the bank.   Free agency would be focused on adding an ILB and a Safety who can play FS in three-S or big nickel sets. The draft would target Edge, WR, and ILB on days 1 and 2. Day 3:  OT depth, S depth, ILB depth.  
    • Seattle is coming across country to our house which will be packed.  We can beat this damn team.  Agree @TheBigKat the team has improved tremendously from last season
×
×
  • Create New...