Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Apparently "love" Luke Kuechly


Gabeking

Recommended Posts

This is what the top 4 LB's on this team would look like if we add Kuechly.

Luke: 4 yrs 12 million, 7 guaranteed.

Beason: 5 yrs 50 mil, 25 guaranteed

Anderson: 5 years 22 mil, 8.5 guaranteed

Davis: 5 years 36.5 mil, 7 guaranteed.

47.5 million guaranteed starting July of last season, and lasting 4 more years, not counting salaries, and bonuses built into the contracts which could double that figure.

Well, it is silly to talk about Davis. Panthers need to quit humoring him at this point. He is done. He needs to retire....he just can't walk away.

We paid Beason prior to getting hurt. It happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, it's not the money that I am trying to get you to look at.

It's the damn position.

43 LB's are not nearly as important as this team (Hurney) pays them.

Other teams do not do this. They pay their DT's, DE's, and CB's. We don't, and we have not been successful enough to argue that it's the right way.

My goodness...sometimes I wonder about you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, it's not the money that I am trying to get you to look at.

It's the damn position.

43 LB's are not nearly as important as this team (Hurney) pays them.

Other teams do not do this. They pay their DT's, DE's, and CB's. We don't, and we have not been successful enough to argue that it's the right way.

My goodness...sometimes I wonder about you guys.

Obviously Hurney pays them because he does think they are important to this team and I am sure Rivera was in favor of it. So why does it matter what some other team thinks is important especially when they run different schemes. Compare us to Philly if you want since we run a similar scheme. They would tell you that linebacker is important to them after their's have sucked for a few years. Went out and brought in Ryans and are favorites to bring in Kuechly if we don't. Look at the Saints they are losing Vilma and have brought in 2 linebackers in free agency because they don't have a first or second rounder.

We have the biggest need for linebackerrs of any 4-3 team out there with 2 very questionable spots. I wonder how anyone can't see the obvious need unless they are in denial about the seriousness of Beason's and Davis's injuries.

As for paying our DEs, DTs, and corners I guess the money we paid Johnson, Edwards and Gamble doesn't count?????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, it's not the money that I am trying to get you to look at.

It's the damn position.

43 LB's are not nearly as important as this team (Hurney) pays them.

Other teams do not do this. They pay their DT's, DE's, and CB's. We don't, and we have not been successful enough to argue that it's the right way.

My goodness...sometimes I wonder about you guys.

Rather pay LBs than RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously Hurney pays them because he does think they are important to this team and I am sure Rivera was in favor of it. So why does it matter what some other team thinks is important especially when they run different schemes. Compare us to Philly if you want since we run a similar scheme. They would tell you that linebacker is important to them after their's have sucked for a few years. Went out and brought in Ryans and are favorites to bring in Kuechly if we don't. Look at the Saints they are losing Vilma and have brought in 2 linebackers in free agency because they don't have a first or second rounder.

We have the biggest need for linebackerrs of any 4-3 team out there with 2 very questionable spots. I wonder how anyone can't see the obvious need unless they are in denial about the seriousness of Beason's and Davis's injuries.

As for paying our DEs, DTs, and corners I guess the money we paid Johnson, Edwards and Gamble doesn't count?????????

How much does Edwards Make 55 really?

CJ is the only Dlinemen making bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously Hurney pays them because he does think they are important to this team and I am sure Rivera was in favor of it. So why does it matter what some other team thinks is important especially when they run different schemes. Compare us to Philly if you want since we run a similar scheme. They would tell you that linebacker is important to them after their's have sucked for a few years. Went out and brought in Ryans and are favorites to bring in Kuechly if we don't. Look at the Saints they are losing Vilma and have brought in 2 linebackers in free agency because they don't have a first or second rounder.

We have the biggest need for linebackerrs of any 4-3 team out there with 2 very questionable spots. I wonder how anyone can't see the obvious need unless they are in denial about the seriousness of Beason's and Davis's injuries.

As for paying our DEs, DTs, and corners I guess the money we paid Johnson, Edwards and Gamble doesn't count?????????

Please god let us be as successful as the Eagles have been over the past 10 years.

You are correct, Hurney does think that the LB position is very important, and it shows in the fact that we continue to overpay for that position.

Hey guys, the game has changed. You have to rush the passer, you have to be able to cover the WR freaks that are out there. Do you need LB's....hell yes. But you don't need 3 first rounders invested at the position over the past 6 seasons.

Who is the most successful 43 team out there right now, and please tell me how they have drafted over the past 10 seasons.

I can go ahead and fill you in....they were't drafting RB's and LB's in the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We tried to pay Pepp and we did pay CJ. Who has this team lost recently that you would have paid instead of Beason. If you look at James Anderson's cap figure it's not that bad for a quality starter. Beason's figure is 5 this year (however it will go up). Thomas Davis was the only brain dead move but his salary has gone down to his credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically we have not gotten any kind of longevity in drafting first round linebackers like we have at other positions on defense such as CB and DE. the fact that people think we're back at square one even after using a disproportionate amount of resources at the linebacker position is very telling.

Davis may never be a starter again. It may take years for Beason to get back to play at a level he once was. This does not mean you spend your highest pick on the biggest most bestest linebacker you can find once again. This doesn't justify continuing to ignore positions that have hindered us for years.

So Claiborne or Coples or best DT on the board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We tried to pay Pepp and we did pay CJ. Who has this team lost recently that you would have paid instead of Beason. If you look at James Anderson's cap figure it's not that bad for a quality starter. Beason's figure is 5 this year (however it will go up). Thomas Davis was the only brain dead move but his salary has gone down to his credit.

I am not arguing with the signing of Beason, he is a team leader, and one of the best players at his position. We took him with the no. 25 overall pick. Yes, we did choose him in the 1st but not nearly as high as 9.

That said, we also used a 1st on Thomas Davis, and this thread is talking about using a top 10 on Kuechly.

It's not about salary this season, it's about how much each player counts against the cap, and how hard it is to extend the really expensive positions like DE, QB, OT, and DT when you have so much money invested in a lower tier position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a problem taking Kuechly with the 9th pick, particulary b/c I think that we will need a quality backup before the seasons out. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't have a lot of conifidence in Davis playing the entire season. However, if I am wrong and Davis and Beason plays the entire season, I'd probably wish we'd taken Coples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what we would really love is for Beason and Davis to return healthy and productive.Having said that the Eagles went out and signed a 5 year contract to replace Long after tearing his Achilles.That is a nasty injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...