Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Targeting Receiver In 1St Round?


KaseKlosed

Recommended Posts

Panthers targeting receiver in 1st round?

panthers.jpgMost mock drafts have the Carolina Panthers matched up with a defensive lineman in the 1st round, but their recent pre-draft visits may indicate another strategy.

Visits don’t necessarily translate to genuine interest in a player but when teams take a closer look at multiple players at the same position, that’s usually a good indication of where their interests lie.

The Panthers have already arranged visits with Justin Blackmon, Michael Floyd and Kendall Wright – the only three consensus 1st-round receivers.

This certainly doesn’t mean the Panthers are locked in to this approach – they’ve also visited two two potential top-10 defensive linemen – but it does indicate they’re at least entertaining the idea of upgrading the talent around Cam Newton.

Personally, I think it would be a wise choice. After spending two 3rd-round picks on defensive tackles in 2011, there’s no need to bring in another rookie so soon. This is Cam Newton’s team, and they would be wise to give him all the support he needs to flourish.

For more info, follow our Draft Visit Tracker, updated daily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers have enough receiving talent on the team. I'm pretty certain they won't take a receiver in the first this year. Maybe next year, but not this year. If anything we may get one in a later round.

Take Steve Smith away, Where's the talent? Not trying to be an a-hole. But if smitty is gone, What do we have? LaFell is a decent #2-3. Gettis is the same with the potential to be a #1, but the jury is out on him too. Pilares, Edwards, Adams, Arijotutu, who else? If smith is gone, Olsen would be our #1 Target, it would be like the old Wesly Walls era.

I'm slowly but surely accepting the notion of picking a WR in the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take Steve Smith away, Where's the talent? Not trying to be an a-hole. But if smitty is gone, What do we have? LaFell is a decent #2-3. Gettis is the same with the potential to be a #1, but the jury is out on him too. Pilares, Edwards, Adams, Arijotutu, who else? If smith is gone, Olsen would be our #1 Target, it would be like the old Wesly Walls era.

I'm slowly but surely accepting the notion of picking a WR in the first.

The problem with your hypothetical is that you don't take Steve Smith away. He's still on our team. You can't draft in the 1st round as a backup plan in case someone gets hurt or something unless you're set at the other positions. That's part of the reason I'm so against Kuechly in the 1st. Now if we took Blackmon in the 1st, or Floyd after a trade down, I wouldn't be upset like if we took Kuechly because we DO need WRs for the near future (unlike LB, we don't have a young elite WR) but since Steve ain't going anywhere for at least this year our receiving corps is acceptable. We got other spots that aren't acceptable, like D-line and CB.

Basically, WR isn't a need yet but I wouldn't be upset if that's the direction we took because it won't be long til it is a need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with your hypothetical is that you don't take Steve Smith away. He's still on our team. You can't draft in the 1st round as a backup plan in case someone gets hurt or something unless you're set at the other positions. That's part of the reason I'm so against Kuechly in the 1st. Now if we took Blackmon in the 1st, or Floyd after a trade down, I wouldn't be upset like if we took Kuechly because we DO need WRs for the near future (unlike LB, we don't have a young elite WR) but since Steve ain't going anywhere for at least this year our receiving corps is acceptable. We got other spots that aren't acceptable, like D-line and CB.

Basically, WR isn't a need yet but I wouldn't be upset if that's the direction we took because it won't be long til it is a need.

This Hypothetical can happen. It's happened before. When Smith went down. We didn't have anyone. Besides, who's to say that Floyd won't indeed take the #1 spot away from Smith? There's a possibility of that happening. You can't put all your eggs in the Smith basket forever. I agree there are other needs, but if Floyd is there and all the other players that were worth a 9 are gone, what then? We don't know the Panthers Board yet. For all we know, this is the pick they are wanting to make. It's all speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said this last night to family. You can look at Bryce as not a “strong and physical” presence and that’s not going to change on you can look at it, that this guy has the type of skillset that sets him up to only get better for the next 5-7 years every year. He’s not going to know less about the game next year than this year. His timing will be better, his pocket presence better (even though the guy works around a pocket amazingly in my opinion), everything is just going to improve every year and I believed he’s already proved the doubters wrong other than nut huggers on here who just want a big strong man to drool over.
    • The Seahawks won an emotional, divisional, overtime rivalry game vs the Rams on a Thursday night (Dec 18).  That gives them 10 days to prepare for the Panthers, but the Christmas holiday fell a week later--I bet they were afforded an extra day for travel-many coming back east.  Following the Panthers, Seattle plays at San Francisco for the division title (in all probability).   The Rams finish the season with games against the Falcons and Cardinals, two likely wins, pushing them to 13-4.  The Niners finish the season with home games against the Bears and Seahawks. Seattle finishes the season with the Panthers on the road and SF in California.   It is easy to see how preparing for the Panthers, during the holiday break and with the Niners waiting for them in SF a week later for (what could be) the NFC West title and #1 Seed in the NFC, could create the perfect trap game scenario.  The Panthers at home are 5-2.   In the past 2 weeks, the Seahawks struggled to beat the Phillip Rivers Colts in Seattle and then pulled off a miraculous, emotional victory at home vs. the Rams.  I am not convinced that they are as good as advertised. Seattle is a TD favorite in Charlotte.  I feel that Carolina by 3 may be more accurate.  While I am still not confident in this team's consistency and it never seems to dominate, it sure feels like a trap game for Seattle to me.  How could they NOT be thinking of San Francisco right now?  They are not used to being in this position (current players) and it is human nature.  Carolina 27, Seattle 24. 
    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
×
×
  • Create New...