Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It Is Going To Be Fletcher Cox.......


Chesapeake Fan

Recommended Posts

Physically, he is young (22 yrs old in Dec.), has a frame to build on (6'4) and lean (300 pounds). When he matures, he will be a solid 320 lbs and not miss a beat in quickness.

Unlike Poe, Brockers, and Coples, he had 3 years of experience in the SEC. Also, he played all across the defensive line (DE, UT, NT) and his MOTOR does not quit!!!

I can see him between Johnson and Edwards for 1-on-1 matchups, next to Mcclain for pass rushing plays, and on DE for 34 defensive schemes.

Check him out against the national champs!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we go D line and Coples is there, he will be our pick. Cox or Ingram will only be the pick if they decide to go D line regardless and Coples is gone already.

I like Kuechly a bunch but won't believe we will actually take him until we do. Then again I didn't think they would pull the trigger on newton either although I wanted him from the start.

Watch is be a corner with my usual luck at predicting our picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we go D line and Coples is there, he will be our pick. Cox or Ingram will only be the pick if they decide to go D line regardless and Coples is gone already.

I like Kuechly a bunch but won't believe we will actually take him until we do. Then again I didn't think they would pull the trigger on newton either although I wanted him from the start.

Watch is be a corner with my usual luck at predicting our picks.

Why is coples a better prospect then Fletcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you should see the OP for pretty big reasons why that is a completely incorrect take given this is a Dave Canales team.
    • TMac is a good player and would've been the right pick if our QB could throw a ball farther than 40 yards. For this team's current build (run first, game management passing attack) and the fact that our TE's are laughably bad - the five on our roster have combined for less than 600 yards total, with 3 TDs - Warren should've been the pick. 
    • If anyone feels like they can't have a conversation about Bryce Young nearly three full seasons into his career maybe assess why and how these conversations end this way instead of looking to shoot the messenger. Why is it okay to label anyone else on the team or coaching staff trash? Folks on the huddle and across the fanbase on social media have fully thrown anyone and everyone including rookie 8th overall pick TMac fully under the bus multiple times this season. But some of you guys apparently expect a pat on the back because Bryce Young successfully evaded a few potential sacks while Tyler Shough got consumed by our pass rush throughout the game and still had a superior performance. The state of this division is hilariously mediocre at best. Bryce Young is the only player on this roster who is allowed to have the lowest bar possible yet we have invested the most resources in him. It's lunacy.
×
×
  • Create New...