Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scientists Say Drinking Beer Wil Not Lead To Beer Belly


KaseKlosed

Recommended Posts

Scientists say drinking beer wil not lead to beer belly

700-01345024w.jpg

6 April 2012 Last updated at 10:30 ETHelp

Scientists from the German Institute of Human Nutrition say they have found proof that the beer belly is a myth.

By studying the hip and waist measurements of nearly 20,000 people over nine years and charting how much beer they drank each day, they found that beer drinking caused overall weight gain rather than causing excess fat in just the stomach area.

BBC Radio 5 live Drive spoke to Steve Miller, the host of TV show Fat Families, who has written about losing weight.

To listen to other Radio 5 live interviews, please visit the Best Bits page.

---------------------------------

Your Belly is a result of Chicken , Cow and Pork Fat building up and collecting in your fatty reserve areas (Belly, Back of Legs, Back of Arms, Buttocks)

All it is is white fat that hasnt been digested by the body because the body is not made to digest large amounts of meat.

Research what you eat my friends!

If your do not take care of your body....where will you live?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a man's caloric intake exceeds his caloric expenditure, the extra calories will be stored as fat. Since a man's fat deposits develop in the midsection first, it results in the large stomach discussed. The "beer belly" received that moniker because beer contains a lot of empty calories and a man who consumes a lot of beer without burning off those calories runs the risk of obtaining the beer belly. I thought this was common knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or, to be more specific:

3500 Calories is roughly equal to 1lb. of fat

1 beer is approx 150 Calories (a can of soda is not far behind)

Thus, 1 beer/night = 15lbs/year

But, as Bronco mentioned, as long as your burn is >= your intake you can eat/drink whatever you want. Simple math.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...