Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayock Torches Coples


jarhead

Recommended Posts

Has him rated as his 50th in his player rankings.Not that I disagree but how can you rate him so low but still have him as the top DE prospect? He has Luke K as number 6 though he believes he will not be drafted that high due to the value of the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea I heard him say he would not take him in the first and maybe even not take him in the second.

I just cant understand how you can rate a player so low to the point he said he may pass on him the 3rd but have him rated as a top DE prospect.Must be the bust potential.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayock 2011:

5. Blaine Gabbert

6. Robert Quinn

10. Daquan Bowers

21. Cam Newton

Just to give people insight of how accurate his rankings are. He has legitimate reasoning; however, so I'm not going to fault the low rank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coples is the Cam Newton of this draft IMO.

I mean that solely on the polarization of the player not whether I think he will be a good pro.

Well I admit he scares me but I would at least grade him as 2nd round pick.I would be curious where some of the pro scouts have him rated and compare.Polarization is certainly the word that describes it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...