Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Attention Whiners ....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Rivera's defense requires a strong LB corps and nothing more than an average and non-poo Dline. As long as they are better than last year our defense will be vastly improved. You're basing your knowledge of how defenses work on a very simplistic and biased view.

Why don't you say what you're implying? Rivera's defense requires LB's who have strong blitzing capabilities. Let me just check Kuechly's resume as a strong pass rusher real quick...

Sounds like a pretty simplistic and biased view to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you say what you're implying? Rivera's defense requires LB's who have strong blitzing capabilities. Let me just check Kuechly's resume as a strong pass rusher real quick...

Sounds like a pretty simplistic and biased view to me.

Not true, especially not out of all the LB positions, and just because he wasn't asked to blitz at BC doesn't mean he lacks the capability. With his athletic measurables he can very well transition to a very good blitzer. I don't however think that will be what he's asked to do. I think the blitzing will primarily come form the two other LB positions and he will be asked to zone cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you say what you're implying? Rivera's defense requires LB's who have strong blitzing capabilities. Let me just check Kuechly's resume as a strong pass rusher real quick...

Sounds like a pretty simplistic and biased view to me.

His only response to this will probally be to cuss you out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our twin rookie 3 round pick DT got physically dominted in their first year. They will be great.

Wrong, and our line play improved as the year went along. By the end of the year, our interior Dline rotation was more than serviceable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true, especially not out of all the LB positions, and just because he wasn't asked to blitz at BC doesn't mean he lacks the capability. With his athletic measurables he can very well transition to a very good blitzer. I don't however think that will be what he's asked to do. I think the blitzing will primarily come form the two other LB positions and he will be asked to zone cover.

So we just spent a 9th overall pick on a guy who

A ) we hope can fit our defensive scheme if another guy gets injured

B ) will replace the guy who broke the team record for tackles last year.

Which one of those is it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His only response to this will probally be to cuss you out.

No, I just reserve that for you and your idiotic and simplistic quips that prove no point whatsoever other than to show that you know nothing about what you are attempting to debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we just spent a 9th overall pick on a guy who

A ) we hope can fit our defensive scheme if another guy gets injured

B ) will replace the guy who broke the team record for tackles last year.

Which one of those is it

I'm not sure, he's a very versatile player, I could see him taking TD's spot on the weakside and playing a lot of zone cover with some edge blitzing, which I think is the most likely scenario. He could even play the middle and we could move Beason outside again, but I don't that that happens. Realistically he could play all three positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we just spent a 9th overall pick on a guy who

A ) we hope can fit our defensive scheme if another guy gets injured

B ) will replace the guy who broke the team record for tackles last year.

Which one of those is it

The only reason that Anderson had so many tackles is because the rest of our defense was in shambles due to injury. Anderson was supposed to be third best linebacker on the field, not the best player on the whole front 7. Not to take anything away from Anderson, because I think that he's a great ball player, but lets be honest here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do people really think our dline is any good? lol

i think cuntly will be a good player, not hating that we got him. though i think we would have been better off adding a position that typically makes a bigger impact on actually winning games.

same way i didn't like us taking two 1st round running backs even though i like stewart as a player. there are better ways to build a team and that's pretty obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't trade Svech for the best FA on the market, Marner included. Matter of fact, someone would be giving up a top line scorer and a couple draft picks for Svech.  Look at it this way, if Svech was a UFA in a couple days, what does his contract look like? That'll tell you everything you need to know. 
    • I know it a real homer take but Im not sure Id slam dunk take that list over Smitty.  Smith just played a different way, he had an ability to just take over a game as a matter of will.  The catch against the giants where he caught it and took a helmet that broke his arm mid air, the games against DeAngelo Hall, 05 Bears playoffs, Ice Up Son, the revenge game against us. Those other WRs may have better stat books but love him or hate him, good guy or bad, Smith just played a different game and when he did look out.
    • Absolutely would have to be anther young scorer with either ELC time or a long term contract...    Could see maybe Kyrou or Robertson.... But I really just dont see him being traded you dont trade your leading post season scorer on a long term deal when he isn't even in his prime yet..   not to mention unless you get more than one of those guys at best it would be lateral with unknown team chemistry.
×
×
  • Create New...