Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers’ Picking Joe Adams Makes Armanti Edwards Obsolete


PantherPhann89

Recommended Posts

0% chance they cut AE before last cuts. He would have to basically kill someone not to make it that far. When you look at it, he is one of the most "experienced" WR on the roster. But I really think his only chance to make the team is as a WR. The biggest negative for him is that you have a ton of guys on the roster that are just like him; small, quick, slot receivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason they will keep AE around one more year is because they gave up so much to get him and drafted him so high. They are praying he works out. So he will get every chance to prove himself at WR. There is no chance he will be the punt returner with Adams on the team. If AE doesn't contribute or show any improvement, then he is gone. No sense to keep him around if he isn't going to help the team. You have to keep the best players. I don't know how many WRs we will keep on the roster but I would think that Smith, Gettis, LaFell, J. Adams, Manno, and Pilares are all definitely on the roster. AE would be 5th or 6th on the depth chart. Maybe Chud can come up with some creative ways to get AE involved in the offense. Maybe in the wildcat or scat back type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys realize we cut Brown right and we gave up even more for him (and Brown was on the field a lot more than AE was)?

They aren't going to keep him on the roster just to save face. If he fails, he is going to be cut. It's that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0% chance they cut AE before last cuts. He would have to basically kill someone not to make it that far. When you look at it, he is one of the most "experienced" WR on the roster. But I really think his only chance to make the team is as a WR. The biggest negative for him is that you have a ton of guys on the roster that are just like him; small, quick, slot receivers.

He's the most experienced WR on the roster and still can't get on the field.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, last year they had to keep him, just for PR duties. There were no other options on the team & everyone is right, they want to see him succeed based only on his draft position (& he is probably a high character guy). I do not think he will make it on the final roster no matter what chances they give him tho.

A guy who doesn't help the team is bad enough, but he has hurt the team on returns. Hurney has a good stable of WRs now & will be able to cut him & say the other guys outperformed him; which I think will be the truth. I hope Hurney learns not to fall in love with players for stupid reasons (...he beat Michigan!). I don't think Hurney has learned tho, b/c he reached for Frank Alexander this year, IMO. I like Alexander & think he will contribute, but why not Jared Crick? (dumb)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...