Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

double teams

panther4life

By panther4life,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
Posted

all this is under the impression that pep was double teamed much.

And I don't think I have ever seen a coach Double Team a guy that hasn't given them a reason to. Peppers is one of the best pass rushers in the league and they know that if you don't DT him he has a good chance of making a big play. Until brown shows he can do the same in the Pro's it wont happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Udogg Enthusiast

Udogg

Posted
Posted

Pep has the bullrush and the speed rush. If he by some chance developed a spin move he would be unstoppable. Plus he has got to be the most held DE in the league. I mean he gets held on almost every passing play. That being said, he appears to take plays off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

i think brown has the potential to be doubled more than peppers this year

I think we are all getting ahead of ourselves. We dont even know if he can take on a NFL T yet much less Two NFL Linemen.

all this is under the impression that pep was double teamed much.

Why double someone that dose not care to rush the passer. Double and a RB could not stop Pep in 03 and 04.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

sometimes i think some of you dont even watch the game...you think beacause pep did not get a sack..he took the game off peppers was in the backfield all last season..but clady did handle him

He was handled in the Cards game as well by a back up T. He got some sacks last year but put up some piss poor performances when the good team came to town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • pantherclaw
      Canales doesn't sound all the way sold on Bryce

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      I enjoy being truthful. Although that means being unbiased. Which most on here are incapable of being unbiased. 
    • Raleigh PF
      Giannis

      By Raleigh PF · Posted

      It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...