I one upped Pete Prisco, even got him to change he story....

[CRA]

sweet.

Since he felt he had to go back and correct it maybe his future Panther reports will show a tad more effort.

[realstandman]

:cornut:

[SCpanther]

Nice job on getting him to correct. He's always inaccurate when it comes to the Panthers.

[Brandon]

sweet.

Since he felt he had to go back and correct it maybe his future Panther reports will show a tad more effort.

Somehow I doubt it'll change anything...

[Fireball77]

Awesome he changed it but the chickenshit little mofo should have credited you by saying that he was prompted to do so by a reader's analysis. Why should he take credit when it wasn't his work?

[outlaw4]

Awesome he changed it but the chickenpoo little mofo should have credited you by saying that he was prompted to do so by a reader's analysis. Why should he take credit when it wasn't his work?

Cause he's Prickso, the almight flip-flopping dumbass that is no smarter than the average Cowboy fan?

[engine9]

I wonder who got paid more, Pete or you?

[AKPantherFan]

good stuff!

[DaveThePanther2008]

^5 That is cause Prisco talks out his A$$. Great Job.

[Mr. Scot]

So I made a thread in response to Pricso's evaluation of our 2006 Draft.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/11696266

He went through every team and originally gave us a "D" grade and put this for his analysis:

Well I created this thread http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/14784626 and about two hours later his grade of our draft changes to B- and he puts this as his analysis:

Wow :sosp:

You know, it isn't that difficult to check facts like this. That's just lazy :nonod:

[Brandon]

Wow :sosp:

You know, it isn't that difficult to check facts like this. That's just lazy :nonod:

Hell whenever I do articles I always make sure to check from two sources and it's all of 5 minutes to do all my research, it really pisses me off to see Prisco try to pull that poo.

[razaki]

Awesome he changed it but the chickenpoo little mofo should have credited you by saying that he was prompted to do so by a reader's analysis. Why should he take credit when it wasn't his work?

Agreed, that's not only showing shoddy journalism by presenting such ridiculous "facts" the first time around, but also changing without citing a source, even generally.

*sigh*:banghead:

[Cpanthers5851]

good stuff man!!