Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Lb Corps Packed With Potential-Yahoo! Sports Article.


Recommended Posts

Potential. A word we hear all the time. It's what makes a team give the opportunity to that one player. This time it's used to describe our beloved LB core. Arguably one of the best in the NFL if healthy.

Ron Rivera and coordinator Sean McDermott seem to be pleased with the potential for the unit to dramatically improve over 2011. Barring injuries -- and, granted, that's never a safe thing to do with the Carolina linebackers -- the unit could be pretty good.

The selection of Boston College star Luke Kuechly in the first round, with the return of three-time Pro Bowl middle linebacker Jon Beason from an Achilles injury that limited him to one game last season, should provide the Panthers with plenty of flexibility. Onetime weak-side starter Thomas Davis is trying to come back from another ACL surgery on his right knee -- the third of his career and second in two seasons -- so he's still a long shot. But if Davis can overcome the knee woes to be even a situational player, he'll add to what could suddenly be a fairly deep position. And that's not taking into account James Anderson, who set a franchise record for tackles last season as the strongside starter.

Kuechly, who played primarily in the middle in college but was on the field for all three downs, seems to have taken pretty well to the weak spot. "He's really fast, not just in terms of running, but also in (smarts)," Beason said. Kuechly, who had seven interceptions in his college career, including three in each of his final two seasons, was regarded by many scouts as a three-down defender, and is clearly more than just a middle run-stuffer.

As long as one of those two returning LB's stay Healthy, Beason or Davis, I think this defense will be significantly better than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nice change from all the bitching back in April when people said we had no need for Kuechly with Beason coming back. Imagine linebacking being a depth position again. Go figure.

Waits for bitchers and moaners to post more negative comments again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more talented LBs we have, the more toys Rivera has to play with. I am giddy over the prospects of what Rivera and Mac are going to dream up.

I just have to believe that having a full off-season this year is going to make a huge difference on the D. Especially the OTAs where there are no pads. These are the teaching times which we so missed last year. The players may have known the playbook last year. The area they were lacking was the nuances of the play. And imo, it is important for players to know why and how a play is supposed to be run. Take it from the classroom to the field in a relaxed atmosphere. (I know these guys are not relaxed, but the atmosphere at OTAs is inducive to learning.)

See. Getting carried away again. But hey, why not? And GOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hands down we have the best group of 4-3 LB's when healthy. Closest 4-3 group to us is Chicago with an aging Urlacher and Briggs with Nick Roach. Kuechly gives us a great tackler as well as solid coverage linebacker that is necessary in today's NFL to match up with athletic TE's and scat backs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed. Kuechly will learn from our vets. I'm glad the core is meshing together nicely. I wish the season would start tomorrow.

You know Ivan, I try hard to give you props, and you make good points, but Zahia's ass popping like that on every one of your posts just makes it hard to do anything else than move on to the next guy's post.

Granted, I move on 8 minutes later, but I move on...completely forgetting what you posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...