Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players On Our Roster Who Could Switch Positions


Recommended Posts

Cam - WR/TE- don't want though, he is too good at QB.

Steve Smtih- CB- One of the best WR in the game, pretty sure he could play the opposite.

CJ- DT- put about 30 pounds on him, he would be a better DT then what we fielded last year.

Bell G, he probably would be better at the G position anyways.

Jimmy Clausen- waterboy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam Newton. Easiest one. Might take a while....but he could be a monster TE

Edwards could be a sub par QB

Years ago, Beason could of been a RB. Doesn't have the hands for today's game though

Otah could be an injury plaqued DT with the right training

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are these suppose to be actual possibilities, most of these are absurd. Cam, Otah, intetchangable Olinemen do not count

I took it as who has the physical skill set to play a different position. Not that it was realistic to move them. Heck, Cam could of be anything froma QB, TE to DE if he was groomed early on and still probably made the NFL. I was just pointing out the athletes and freaks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are these suppose to be actual possibilities, most of these are absurd. Cam, Otah, intetchangable Olinemen do not count

Yea, it's suppose to be realistic (I think) from what I gather. It's an uber stupid topic, which is why I am struggling.

I mean, let the coaches decide who changes positions, not some beaver writing on the net like me.

I do like a few of the lineman mentioned and Martin to CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...