Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Speculation: 'Cats No. 2 pick for James Harden per CBSSports Blog


cdandi1

Recommended Posts

http://www.cbssports...-deal-no-2-pick

The Charlotte Bobcats are eyeing the possibility of dealing the No. 2 overall pick in a trade that would bring a more established player, multiple sources told CBSSports.com.

One source said that Oklahoma City's James Harden could be in play due to the Thunder's salary situation following next season. GM Sam Presti already has Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook on the books for more than $29 million next season -- and both Harden and Serge Ibaka will command huge contracts after the 2012-13 campaign

None of these players is considered a franchise-changer -- and that's why the Bobcats would prefer to deal the pick and land an established player such as Harden who could come in immediately and make an impact.

My only question would be..would he sign a contract extension?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to remember is, that any trade for our pick would have to net us a no 1 pick in return. With Chicago holding a protected 1st of ours, the NBA won't allow any trade that has the possibility of us going 2 years in a row without a first rounder. As remote as it would be, trading for Harden straight up would leave open the chance that we wouldn't have a first rounder this year and next. OKC would have to give us their 1st along with Harden. That probably wouldn't be a big deal for the Thunder as any player at that spot wouldn't be a game changer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be really nice to get a player like Harden, who can create for others off the dribble and would immediately come in with the best 3 point shot on the team. I'm just not sure he will be worth the big contract its going to take to keep him around, considering his somewhat irregular minutes with the Thunder (usually playing with the 2nd unit) and his below average defense. He is still young, so I guess the question is, do you think he can develop into a go to player (if not the only one, then one of the top 2 or 3 players on a successful team)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to remember is, that any trade for our pick would have to net us a no 1 pick in return. With Chicago holding a protected 1st of ours, the NBA won't allow any trade that has the possibility of us going 2 years in a row without a first rounder. As remote as it would be, trading for Harden straight up would leave open the chance that we wouldn't have a first rounder this year and next. OKC would have to give us their 1st along with Harden. That probably wouldn't be a big deal for the Thunder as any player at that spot wouldn't be a game changer.

we have two firsts next year anyway, and the pick we owe Chicago is protected enough so that it won't be a factor next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like James Harden but I only do this trade if Harden signs an extension and we get their first pick in return.

I dont see any way though that OKC trades Harden. They will sign Harden and trade Ibaka or Perkins if they needed to clear up space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like James Harden but I only do this trade if Harden signs an extension and we get their first pick in return.

I dont see any way though that OKC trades Harden. They will sign Harden and trade Ibaka or Perkins if they needed to clear up space.

The thing is, its going to be very difficult to keep both Harden and Ibaka once their rookie contracts are done, and I just dont see OKC letting Ibaka go. You could argue (correctly imo) Harden was a bigger part of their success this season, but 22 year olds who lead the NBA in blocked shots dont come around often. And since OKC has already built their team around 2 perimeter players in Westbrook and Durant, it kind of leaves Harden as the odd man out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WR: Nico, Woods, Tank (R) TE: Schultz OL: Tunsil/Howard/Deiter/Mason/Fant vs. WR: Chark, Thielen, Mingo (R) TE: Hurst OL: Icky/Zavala (R)/Bozeman/Jensen (R)/Moton   Panthers' had the better OL before losing BC week 1 and AC week 4 which is kind of ironic considering how in the following year DB went down in W1 and Shaq in W4 resulting in the defense going all to Hell. CJ has done amazing in Houston, but he also wasn't asked to carry Zavala, Jensen, Mingo, Hurst, and Chark as a rookie.
    • Past 5 seasons, IMO CJ Stroud and Joe Burrow are the 2 best young QBs that have emerged in the league in that window.  They also didn’t need vets to be their primary pass catchers.  They helped fellow youngsters be great at WR.   almost all the other young QBs have been paired up with vets in their top options….and haven’t been as promising.  so it isn’t Madden.  But the league hasn’t played out as you suggest it does.   Good QBs make others around them better.   
    • In 2023 their roster wasn’t stacked. They nailed the poo out of the 2023 draft and since they knew Davis Mills wasn’t the guy, they tanked properly to get pick 2. They also took Cleveland’s ridiculous offer for Watson unlike us with Burns. Houston received enough draft capital to jump up to 3 while picking up the right guys in Anderson and Stroud. The Texans were not stacked or better than us in 2023. They had 11 total wins from 2020 to 2022. They didn’t have a terrible front office so they made sure they got their QB of the future while tanking well and getting more draft picks. They are a textbook study of what we should have done in 2022/2023 offseason even though people in here still think tanking is a bad word and our culture would be bad if we were the Texans. We literally had the chance to be the Texans right now and fuged it up.
×
×
  • Create New...