Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Harrison Barnes: Matt Carroll redux?


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

Tom Sorenson:

Five players auditioned for the Charlotte Bobcats Thursday, among them Harrison Barnes of North Carolina. The Bobcats have the second pick in the NBA draft, and Barnes is the only one of the five who is a candidate.

As we wait for the players to finish, I tell a man that Barnes reminds me of Charlotte’s Matt Carroll. The sentence is out of my mouth no more than two seconds when Carroll walks onto the practice court.

This is more than a coincidence.

Carroll is a very good shooter (he wasn’t last season, but little went right for Charlotte last season). Barnes is a very good shooter.

Carroll is 6-6 and 212 pounds. Barnes is 6-8 and 210 pounds.

Carroll almost never goes to the basket. Barnes almost never goes to the basket.

You watched the Tar Heels last season. You waited for Barnes to fake a shot and drive and draw a foul or hit a layup.

But if Barnes drove, it was in a car after the game.

As pretty as his shot is, his reluctance or inability to beat his man off the dribble means the Bobcats can't – all right, shouldn't – invest their golden No. 2 pick on him.

How did Barnes, who turned 20 last month, look Wednesday?

“He played to his strengths,” says Charlotte coach Mike Dunlap. “He shoots the ball extremely well, he’s a very good athlete and he’s got a good attitude.”

Three other Tar Heels will be drafted. I think point guard Kendall Marshall, who sees the court exquisitely, will be the best of them.

But others see qualities in Barnes I don’t. One of them auditioned Thursday. He is C.J. Williams, a guard-forward out of N.C. State. Williams played four seasons for the Wolfpack, the last two against Barnes.

In the interest of fairness I should point out that Williams and Barnes like each other.

Can Barnes go to the basket?

“I‘m surprised you’d even ask me that question,” Williams says. “Yes, he can go to the basket. He’s a very physical basketball player. When he uses his body to get between you and the basket and it’s just tough to get through that.”

So I’m wrong to consider him a jump shooter?

“He’s a really good jump shooter,” says Williams. “So there’s no problem with thinking of him as a jump shooter. But I think of him as an overall scorer.”

I think of him as a jump shooter.

Barnes would like to be a Bobcat.

“They seem very interested,” he says. “It just depends on what they need the most, whether it’s a perimeter player or a big.”

Michael Jordan, the Bobcats owner, watches the audition. Along with sharing a Tar Heel pedigree, Barnes and Jordan share a name. Barnes’ middle name is Jordan, and it’s not because of Carolina Panthers tackle Jordan Gross.

Barnes is asked if auditioning in front of his middle namesake was tough or intimidating.

“Naw, I was going to ask him for a shooting contest but he skipped out a little early,” Barnes says.

Of course Barnes would challenge Jordan to a shooting contest as opposed to, say, a ball-handling contest.

I ask Barnes if he can do things he didn’t show at North Carolina.

“I think the biggest thing is I’m just trying to improve my game, all-around game,” he says. “Especially putting it on the floor, that’s my biggest knock, and definitely trying to show teams I’ve been working on that, putting it on the floor and getting to the basket. Also being able to find guys, which I’ll be able to demonstrate.”

Can you put it on the floor?

“Yeah,” says Barnes. “I have the ability to.”

Meanwhile, out on court, Matt Carroll hits shot after shot, from angles easy and difficult, all of them jumpers.

Unlike Barnes he knows what he can't do.

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/06/21/3333350/harrison-barnes-matt-carroll-redux.html#storylink=cpy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tome Sorensen should have left that one in his computer. It isn't even a good comparison.

And Barnes did attack the rim but it is hard when you have 2 big men always in the paint with their defenders.

UNC wants their baskets coming off assists, not dribbling around trying to get to the basket.

UNC actually charts their assist to made baskets ratio..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, he doesn't think much of Barnes. While he could end up being nothing but a jumpshooter, I think he will bring much more to the table. Its very risky for the Cats to draft Barnes. I think they want to take him but fear the backlash of drafting a Carolina guy again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barnes has a sweet jumper & killer instinct. He can also drive, it's hard to drive with Henson/Zeller standing in the lane. I still say Barnes will be the best player from this entire draft. If Cleveland moves up it's to steal Barnes, not draft Beal who will still be available at 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, he doesn't think much of Barnes. While he could end up being nothing but a jumpshooter, I think he will bring much more to the table. Its very risky for the Cats to draft Barnes. I think they want to take him but fear the backlash of drafting a Carolina guy again.

They've only drafted and kept TWO UNC PLAYERS in their history, both in the same year. Brandon Wright wasn't their pick.

That "the Bobcats always take the UNC guy" myth is as DUMB as most myths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont expect much from this Hornet fluffer. Shitty comparison, shitty article. Why all the Barnes hate?

Polarizing players are either loved or hated. Barnes will be the Cats 1st star. Mark it down. No way they pass on him or trade away the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...