Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake gunslinger or game manger


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Lot of talk about this so what do you think Jake is…a gunslinger or game manager

I know gunslinger sound better and game managers have sort of a bad rep for no huge arm strength..But I have heard more people call Jake a game manager than gunslinger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more of a personality trait than what their arm does. Obviously weak armed QBs can't strike deep, but the who concept of a gunslinger is something different to just throwing deep.

A gunslinger is a player who feels they need to make plays to get the team to win. They have this inside pressure to always look for the big play and to occassional take big risks in doing so. These kind of players rarely have consistent seasons throughout, but they also win several games with late desperate come backs. The main attribute that fits these guys is a great mental strength. They turn the ball over, often, but they also put up points. They need the strength to always forget the last play and to keep pushing for the win.

A game manager tends to allow the game to play out and waits for mistakes in the defense. The will correctly go through their progressions and often just use the easy dump off to maintain drives rather than going for the big play. They feel it is more important to keep the offense on the field for as long as possible, thus keeping the ball off the ground and the clock ticking. They are also VERY aware of the situation and need to be able to change things at the line. These guys are calm and rarely get riled up as that affects their composure and the game plan.

Jake fits the gunslinger mentality. Strong willed, emotional, driven and will try to win the game if it hangs on the balance.

Most feel the Panthers need a game manager to compliment their running game, but this is not the case. Our offensive scheme uses the passing game as a big play factor to force teams to keep only 8 in the box. If we used more short passing drive maintaining throws, it would allow the safeties to come up and we would find out running game would be smothered. So we use a more aggressive passing game to keep the safeties playing honest. We also feel with a consistent running game we can generally gget a first down with two runs, which allows us to go for a big playand get some big yardage in one go. This also means we do a lot of three and outs, as if the opposition correctly diagnoses our first or second down, we are often put in a tricky third down situation, which neither our passing or running game is suited for.

Jake fits the kind of QB that our scheme needs. We need someone who is not afraid to look for the big play and his career comeback wins speaks volumes that he wins games that are on the line. If you all feel a game manager is what we need, you need to look no further than David Carr. The guy was brilliant at using his check downs and trying to keep the drive going, but that kind of ideal got us stuck as they knew we had no way of going deep. So they stiffled our running and passing game in the same manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake was once called a Poor Man's Farve...(sorry had to say it)...we dont need jake sitting back there making dump off and check down throws. We occasionally need the bomb to Smitty to keep defenses honest.... Jake needs to be a gunslinger but manage the game...a sack is better than giving them six....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...we dont need jake sitting back there making dump off and check down throws. We occasionally need the bomb to Smitty to keep defenses honest.... Jake needs to be a gunslinger but manage the game...a sack is better than giving them six....

this can be said of every QB...not every QB can do it. Jake definitely cannot do it on a consistent basis.

Gunslinger and game manager are the two ends of the spectrum. There is no hybrid of the two. There are game managers who can throw deep and there are gunslingers who are really good at handing the ball off to a stud back but there is no such thing as a gunslinger who can manage the game and make the smart play consistently.

In Fox's run first, play smart D scheme I have always felt that a game manager was higher on the priority list to fit the offense and Jake is NOT a true game manager. Not at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pennington threw 4 vs the Ravens and he is not a risk taker type of QB. Sometimes craptacular games turn up at the worst time.

Yeah, but the Ravens defense is quite a few notches above Arizona's.

As for the original question, Jake is a little bit of neither. He's an average QB with one incredibly gifted WR. Look back at the SD and CHI games last year. Jake couldn't throw the "lob it deep and let Smitty do the work" passes, so he had to actually make plays. And he did. Now look at the GB and NO games. We won both games because Jake threw up a prayer and Smitty answered it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would a game manger be what Touchdown Jesus was born in? :confused:

0-4-touchdown-jesus.JPG

As to the topic, he's a gunslinger, and that's exactly what an offense under John Fox needs. If Fox had a game manager running his conservative attack, we'd have no spark at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this can be said of every QB...not every QB can do it. Jake definitely cannot do it on a consistent basis.

Gunslinger and game manager are the two ends of the spectrum. There is no hybrid of the two. There are game managers who can throw deep and there are gunslingers who are really good at handing the ball off to a stud back but there is no such thing as a gunslinger who can manage the game and make the smart play consistently.

In Fox's run first, play smart D scheme I have always felt that a game manager was higher on the priority list to fit the offense and Jake is NOT a true game manager. Not at all.

You are wrong....while QB's can be one or the other they can work on perfecting the other.... A Gunslinger can manage the game when needed...i.e. brett Farve's best years was when he was able to manage the game and not have to force issues....A game manager can sometimes foce issues to keep defenses honest....Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Phillip rivers are good examples of a QB being able to use both....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...