Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason still hasn't practiced


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Steve Reed SteveReedAP

@

Steve Smith, Mike Tolbert, Jordan Gross, Jon Beason among those who did not practice today. They won't play vs. Steelers.

I'm becoming worried.

Carolina Panthers Panthers

@

Rivera says Steve Smith is feeling great and is expected to be fine for Week 1 against Tampa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice news about SS... what's up with Beason, his hammy? Maybe they're gonna hold him out until the first practice in direct prep for the Tampa Bay game... maybe... I hope... please...

it's his hammy from what i've heard and it's got more to do with tenderness as a result of him healing from his achilles. he had to compensate (well, i don't know if he had to) and that stressed it. best thing for hammys is rest. no need to push it right now. it won't take him long to get back into the swing of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just hoping it doesn't turn into every week he's "supposed"to practice or "just a matter of time" and he ends up missing more weeks like Gettis. Gettis has been sidelined for nearly three months already and had to be put on PUP. For his hamstring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe this at all.
    • His PPG actually did go up a little in Colorado. We will see. I still sort of believe we saw pretty close to the peak of his abilities last year. Not wishing him ill or trashing him in any way. Just tend to believe we did sell high and correctly so.
    • Well, other teams also had an offseason. I honestly agree with him. Right now I have way more faith in Coker ascending then I do XL. I think it's the TE/WR group dragging us down. Plus he does mention that the list was made with WR's very much valued more than RB's and TE's(I understand the thought process). In that context, we have a very aging AT, two "wait and see" second year players(one leaning bust) and a rookie.  I really think this is a very fair rating, on paper and in the offseason. Quite frankly, aside from the aforementioned and aging AT, this is a bunch of guys still trying to prove themselves.  Then when you go to TE, it's easily a bottom 3-4 unit on paper. That is probably being extremely generous.  RB is where we make our hay. Probably a top 5-10 unit. But....he mentions early in the article that he doesn't value the RB units as much.  So, really, it's the weighting of the skill positions that is what really fugs us.
×
×
  • Create New...