Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pick'em and WIN - Week 1 edition...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Welcome to the regular season PIck'em!

This week you are playing for an 8x10 of my main man Jonathan Stewart taken by yours truly. There will be exactly 1 of these in existence.

i-FP7Tfbg-M.jpg

The rules...

- Huddle Membership Required

- Each week there will be 10 games to pick.

- Deadline for picking those games is 11am on Sunday.

- Most correct picks wins.

- Winner of the week receives a prize

- In the event of a tie, I will be posting a tie breaking question that involves a Monday NIght Football game. Closest answer determines the winner. (example: Total Rushing Yards in MNF).

Click Here to Register as a Huddle Member (free)

Click Here to Pick'em (free)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are staff members eligible? Even so, if I win, I would like to donate my winnings to charity. My favorite charity is The Human Fund.

Actually, if I win, I will just pull a Cam and have you give it to a young fan who passes our tailgate on game day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...